From where and where does the Crimean bridge lead. What is the fastest way to get to Crimea by car? Options for movement through the Krasnodar Territory. Consequences of the opening of the Kerch bridge
Maps have already been issued, on which Crimea is part of Russia. This fact caused a wave of patriotism among the inhabitants of the peninsula. The Kerch bridge on the Google map so far has a schematic outline. Currently, the construction has not yet been completed, but it is proceeding at a rapid pace. It is planned to complete the commissioning of the facility by 2018.
Where is the bridge built across the Kerch Strait: map
Not all residents of the country yet know where the bridge across the Kerch Strait is being built, the map can give an accurate answer to this question. It is laid from the territory of the Krasnodar Territory from the Taman Peninsula. It can be seen that the bridge across the Kerch Strait on the map does not interfere with the work of the ferry crossing. Currently, the platforms run on schedule, carrying automobile transport and tourist buses.
The map demonstrates how the Crimean bridge across the Kerch Strait will connect the peninsula and the mainland. The total length of the structure is nineteen kilometers. Along it there is an island, through which strips will also be laid. The Kerch bridge from the satellite will be visible quite well. It will also be reflected in the maps.
Bridge across the Kerch Strait on the map: plans for the construction of approaches
Scheme Kerch bridge on the map shows not only the entire length of the structure, but also the approaches to the object. It is planned to lay highways to the bridge from the side of the Krasnodar Territory and the peninsula. The Kerch Bridge on the map of Russia is another achievement of the united people. The crossing is a logical continuation of the A-290 highway, which is laid between Novorossiysk and Kerch. It also passes through Anapa.
The construction of the Kerch bridge on the map connects two regions. With the completion of the work, tourists will have the opportunity to freely travel between the Crimea and the Krasnodar Territory. Azov and Black Sea meet new tourists. Satellite photos of the Kerch bridge allow us to see that there is no longer a need to cross the border of Ukraine in order to visit the resort.
The path between the resort areas will be significantly reduced. This is vividly demonstrated by the Kerch Bridge from space, the photo of which can be seen right now. Approaches to the crossing and renovation of motorways will be carried out in the near future. This is included in the program for the reconstruction of roads in Crimea. The satellite view of the Kerch bridge will appear in all its glory.
Work on new maps continues. Now the peninsula has become an integral part of the Russian Federation. The bridge across the Kerch Strait satellite photos will also be included in the overall picture of the territory of Russia. Every year Crimea will receive more and more tourists. This will be facilitated by the availability of resorts. And to find the way to the destination will help the map of the Kerch bridge satellite or printed version.
Vladimir Putin took part in the opening of the Crimean Bridge. The President was the first to cross the bridge; car traffic on it will open the next day. Participated in the opening ceremony and billionaire Arkady Rotenberg, who took part in monitoring the progress of construction.
The rupture of Ukrainian-Russian relations and the annexation of Crimea to Russia, which exacerbated the economic crisis, paradoxically brought to life the largest infrastructure projects. First of all, we are talking about laying an energy bridge between Russia and Crimea, railway bypassing Ukraine, and now the transport bridge across the Kerch Strait.
All three projects required huge injections from the budget. Economic expediency was not discussed: political motives came to the fore.
Energy bridge and railway
The first energy bridge was completed - in May 2016. The urgent need for it arose after the energy blockade of the peninsula by Ukraine. In 2014-2016, electricity was regularly cut off in Crimea.
The total cost of the energy bridge was, according to official estimates, 47 billion rubles: most of the funds went to the construction of power lines (TL) from the Rostov nuclear power plant to the Taman Peninsula. In order to obtain a power source, the commissioning of power unit No. 3 at this nuclear power plant was accelerated. Cable-overhead lines were thrown across the Kerch Strait - by air on supports and along the seabed. In addition, a substation and the necessary infrastructure were built.
Since Soviet times, part of the railway route south of Moscow passed through the border area of Ukraine in Lugansk region. After the events of 2014, this moment acquired strategic importance: the Russian authorities considered that Ukraine could block rail traffic along these lines. As a result, the second step was the construction of a new route along the Voronezh and Rostov regions bypassing Ukraine with a length of 137 km. The laying was completed in August 2017 and cost about 55 billion rubles. The work was carried out by the railway troops.
Very long, very expensive
The price of the Crimean bridge surpassed all previous works and cost 228 billion rubles. The crossing turned out to be one of the most complex technical structures erected after the collapse of the USSR: the 18 km long road and rail bridge was built in rather difficult geological conditions and generated a lot of environmental and political risks.
The main domestic political choice was the choice of the main construction contractor, the Stroygazmontazh company, owned by Arkady Rotenberg, who is among Putin's longtime friends. This, of course, caused a surge of discontent and various suspicions about the corruption component, as well as the inefficiency of the project and the enrichment of the oligarch at the expense of the state budget.
However, the state had a different logic: it did not find other companies with the relevant experience, finances and technical capabilities for the construction of such an object. The unexpected annexation of Crimea and its expected blockade, which affected 2.3 million local residents, forced the Russian authorities to act quickly and unconventionally. If there was enough time for other megaprojects of the Putin era, such as the restoration of Grozny, the ESPO pipeline, the renovation of Vladivostok for the APEC summit with the construction of a bridge to Russky Island and the construction of facilities for the Sochi Olympics, then in this case the deadlines were running out.
After the peninsula was cut off from rail traffic, and the Ukrainian side introduced strict control over road traffic from the mainland, only the ferry and air means of supply and communication with Crimea remained. It was fundamentally important for the Kremlin to show and prove that it is capable of providing unhindered access to its new territory.
Why was there no competition?
Such infrastructure projects often become non-competitive, as the level of complexity and speed prompt action immediately. Thus, when the United States occupied Iraq, Halliburton and the Bechtel Group associated with the Republicans received contracts for large-scale restoration work worth billions of dollars (Vice President Dick Cheney worked at the head of the first of them before he was elected), and sometimes without competition, which was explained force majeure.
But this always causes the temptation of illicit enrichment, since the funds are huge, and control over them is reduced. Here we can recall the largest Russian company Mostovik, which rose on such orders: among other things, it built a bridge to Russky Island. Immediately after the Sochi Olympics in 2014, the company declared itself bankrupt, and the management of Mostovik was arrested. So the suspicions of the public may not be groundless and need to be carefully checked and rechecked. Aleksey Kudrin, the Accounts Chamber, will certainly do this.
The railway load on the bridge has not been calculated - does Crimea need so many trains and will they pay off? The holiday season is one thing, but on the peninsula it lasts about four months. Long-haul trains are no longer used anywhere in the world as a means of delivering vacationers.
For example, the Channel Tunnel is economically justified because high-speed trains pass through it with a short travel time between London and Paris. But already Japan's Seikan Tunnel between Hokkaido and Honshu is showing a steady decline in passenger numbers as air travel is faster. At the same time, more than two times more people live in Hokkaido than in Crimea. Of the three bridges across the Bosphorus, only one was made road-rail.
The main lesson of the Crimean bridge is that if the state seriously wants to achieve something, then it will make every effort to achieve the goal. Road traffic opened six months ahead of schedule. However, after the holiday, a hangover often sets in, sometimes turning out to be quite bitter.
Many people are now looking for the Crimean bridge on the map. For the peninsula, it has become a real attraction. Now you can definitely bring magnets and souvenirs with his image. How to find this symbol of unity on the map and with the help of navigation applications, let's take a closer look.
If we consider the location of the bridge from the side of the mainland of Russia, then the entrance to the Crimean bridge runs through the Taman highway from the village of Soleny. From Taman, the bridge extends to the Crimean peninsula through the Kerch Strait. It crosses the island of Tuzla and heads towards the Crimean coast, to the city of Kerch.
The Crimean bridge consists of four sections. The first from Kerch to the island of Tuzla is six kilometers long. The second section runs along the island of Tuzla with a length of six and a half kilometers. The third part (1.4 kilometers) runs from Tuzla to the Taman Peninsula. The fourth part runs along the peninsula, its length is five kilometers.
Bridge display on Yandex.maps and Google.maps services
The unwillingness to recognize the reunification of Crimea with Russia sometimes acquires a fantastic character. Even world famous search engines sometimes succumbed to mass hysteria.
So the developers of Google Maps, until the last, stubbornly refused to notice the existence of the bridge. Its graphic image appeared only two days after the opening of the passage through it.
Somewhat simpler and more loyal is their direct competitor Yandex. They not only promptly placed the image of the bridge in the application, but also set up a system that allows for operational coverage of the condition of the roads on the entire bridge and the roads adjacent to it, so that drivers can see the level of congestion on the roads. This application will allow you to estimate the approximate waiting time on the way and get the best route.
About landmarks and detailed location for motorists
Depending on how much time you have and how much you are willing to spend on fuel, you can get to the Kerch Bridge from the Krasnodar Territory in several ways at once.
You can move through Timashevsk and Slavyansk-on-Kuban. There is an opportunity to ride around the southern metropolis of Krasnodar. Pave the way through the resort towns of Novorossiysk, Gelendzhik, Goryachiy Klyuch. If you are not limited by time, let yourself enjoy the beauties of one of the most resort regions countries.
The most picturesque, but longest option is to move along the M4 highway to the city of Novorossiysk, turn onto A 290 to the direction of the Crimean bridge. This will be the longest way, but you will have the opportunity to see several seaside resorts at once, such as Anapa, Gelendzhik, and the city of Novorossiysk itself is rich in interesting places.
The fastest way to get on the M4 highway to 1145 kilometers. Turn off to the village of Kanevskaya, drive through Timashevsk, the farms of Telegin and Bely, turn onto A 290. This method will not only save fuel, but also time with nerves that will definitely suffer from hourly downtime in traffic jams.
You can appreciate the Krasnodar traffic jams, drive through the city in the east and south, get on the A 146 and switch to the A 290. Of course, the travel distance will be shorter, but be prepared that the situation on local roads is no better than in Moscow or St. Petersburg.
Another option is to turn off at the 1278th kilometer of the M 4 highway to Korenovsk or 1199 to the village of Pavlovskaya. From here, change lanes to A 290.
Positions for navigation systems
Not all systems for navigators indicate the location and entrances to the Crimean bridge. One of the most popular developers "Navitel" made changes to its maps and displayed all the routes adjacent to the bridge, made it possible to plot a route.
If after reading this material you still have questions about how to find the Crimean bridge on the map, ask them in the comments below.
The notorious Crimean bridge, which until recently was called the Kerch bridge, is at the final stage of construction. About how much the invaders spent on its construction, with what features it happened and what could destroy the bridge from Taman to Kerch - in article 24 of the Channel.
Russian President Vladimir Putin on May 15 or 16 (the Kremlin decided to make an intrigue with the date), accompanied by his always faithful "Night Wolves", should pompously open the newly built Crimean bridge. To begin with, only cars and buses will be able to move freely on it - the occupiers are still completing the construction of the railway part, but they are afraid to let trucks in.
Who and when built the bridge from Kerch
In history, there have already been several attempts to connect the Crimea and Kuban with a crossing - for the first time, the bridge was completed in 1944. However, he did not stand for long - he was destroyed by a strong ice drift already at the beginning of 1945.
In modern times, the construction of the bridge was in the plans of Ukraine for a long time. The work was not accepted because of the high cost of the project, but in April 2010 Moscow and Kyiv nevertheless concluded an Agreement on the construction of the Kerch bridge.
Before the annexation of Crimea by Russia, the bridge was needed to improve transport links between the countries of the Black Sea basin, which agreed to build a road around the sea. Each country independently had to reduce its section. In Ukraine, the route was supposed to pass through Kerch, because the detour Sea of Azov extended the route by 500 kilometers.
"Construction of the century"
After the occupation of Crimea, Putin announced his intention to urgently build a crossing across the Kerch Strait. Ukraine, on the other hand, withdrew from the contract on the construction of the bridge within the shortest legal time.
In order to be in time with the "construction of the century" before the 2018 presidential elections, State Duma deputies adopted a document that allowed the construction of the Kerch bridge without observing any laws at all. In Moscow, the developer was allowed to disregard the norms of environmental and urban planning legislation, destroy monuments of history and archeology, freely seize land at the population.
The cost of the Crimean bridge is now 228 billion rubles
The right to build the bridge went to billionaire Arkady Rotenberg close to Putin. The oligarch is known for being the childhood sparring partner of the head of the Kremlin in judo.
However, Putin's friend had a hard time with the construction of the facility - the contractors were afraid to get stuck in the work because of the sanctions that awaited them. It took longer to find a contractor for the construction of the railway part of the bridge - no one wanted to take on this work at all.
Characteristics of the Crimean bridge
The length of the new structure is 19 kilometers, 11.5 of them are on land and another 7.5 kilometers are over the sea. The bridge connects the Kerch and Taman Peninsulas through the island of Tuzla and the Tuzla Spit.
The bridge across the Kerch Strait consists of parallel road and rail sections. The highway has 4 lanes, the maximum speed on it will be 120 km/h.
The railroad has two tracks. The estimated speed of passenger trains on the bridge is 120 km/h, freight trains are 80 km/h.
Characteristics of the Crimean bridge
Now the construction of the railway part of the Crimean bridge continues. It should be completed by December 2019.
What's wrong with the Crimean bridge?
The main claims to the Crimean bridge - besides the fact that it was built illegally, violating all conceivable international norms - is its location. The Ukrainians planned to build in the northern part of the Kerch Strait, because the further south, the worse the conditions.
Thus, Georgy Rosnovsky, the author of two Ukrainian projects for the Kerch bridge, is convinced that of all options The Russians chose the most unsuitable transport crossing across the strait - it is the most expensive and most difficult of all that have ever been offered.
In total, during the time of independent Ukraine, the possibility of building a crossing in four places was considered. Three of them connected Crimea with the Chushka Spit on the Russian coast: the Northern one ran at the easternmost point of the Crimea - Cape Lantern, Zhukovsky - in the area of the ferry crossing, Yenikalsky - in the vicinity of the Yeni-Kale fortress, and the most southern of the options was Tuzlinsky.
What can destroy the Crimean bridge?
Experts say that the durability of the Crimean bridge is under big question. They explain that everything will depend on natural disasters and loads on the bridge.
First of all, in the area of the bridge, reliable primary soils are located at a depth of 90 meters in some places. The Kerch Strait itself is located in the region of a tectonic fault and there is a network of deep mud volcanoes not far from the island of Tuzla. When they "breathe" - there are vibrations of the soil.
Through this feature, the Russians must drive the piles to a depth of 100 meters and also at the right angle, taking into account possible earthquakes. However, according to experts' forecasts, there are no such technologies in Russia and similar experience construction. And although Moscow has announced about the pillars hammered to a depth of 90 meters, not everyone is in a hurry to believe it.
Another danger is the passage of the bridge over the Tuzla Spit, which is constantly being washed away.
Bridge construction site from space: photo by NASA astronaut Tim Kopra
In addition, as Russian hydrobuilder Yuri Sevenard explained, the construction did not take into account extreme weather conditions - strong winds, storms, strong currents and ice rising.
Another danger is a large number of shells left in the region since World War II. In Russia, they swore that before the start of construction, they surveyed the territory and found 700 shells.
Cracks and other fails
In April 2018, photos appeared on the network showing that the 256th pillar, which is located almost in the center of the Kerch Strait, cracked in two places.
Cracks on the 256th support (video):
And this is not the first failure in the area. In February 2018, subsidence of supports by one meter was recorded. However, this subsidence was far from the first - a similar situation happened in September 2017, when construction had to be suspended. This happened after the installation of one of the spans of the bridge - one support sank by a meter, the other by one and a half.
This confirms the concerns of experts on the reliability of the bridge. According to forecasts, the supports may not withstand the load of even an empty railway line. And the main problems will begin with the launch of freight trains.
What is Ukraine losing?
During the development of bridge projects by Ukraine, it was noted that the height of the navigable arch should be at least 50 meters from the average long-term sea level. However, Russia in the main navigable part of the Kerch Canal brought together only a 35-meter arch.
Because of such a vile step, Ukraine is losing millions of hryvnias and jobs. In particular, this destabilizes the situation in Mariupol and Berdyansk.
Now, as the director of the Mariupol Commercial Sea Port Alexander Oleinik calculated, only with whom the port used to work.
The Center for the Study of the Army, Conversion and Disarmament stated that the construction of the invaders would lead to 25-30% losses of Ukrainian ports.
How does Ukraine react?
In accordance with a separate agreement between Ukraine and Russia, any construction in the Kerch Strait can only be carried out with the permission of both parties. Therefore, all work in the Kerch Strait is completely illegal.
Back in 2017, the Ministry of Justice began to prepare a lawsuit and calculate the losses of lost funds by the Mariupol and Berdyansk trading ports. The lawsuit will also take into account the fact that during construction, Russia closed the Kerch Strait for ships in order to build the arch of the bridge.
Ukraine also monitors contractors that are working on the construction of the bridge. They are included in the sanctions lists.
The bridge across the Kerch Strait is designed to solve the problem of transport communication with Crimea for Russia. The company of Arkady Rotenberg, a businessman close to the President of Russia, is going to complete the construction of the bridge in 2018. I tried to figure out why the deadline for completing the project can be considered ambitious, and scientists and experts consider the construction of the bridge unsafe.
Nikolay GOROKHOVPlans for the construction of a bridge across the Kerch Strait existed in the USSR as early as the mid-1930s, but the war prevented their implementation. The bridge was also going to be built by the Nazis after the occupation of Crimea in 1941. Hitler wanted to simplify the transfer of troops to the Caucasus, but the resources of the warring Germany were only enough for a cable car. The first real bridge from the Krasnodar region to the Crimea was built by the Soviet army after the liberation of the peninsula in 1944. To do this, they used the material left by the Germans. Metal supports were installed between the two banks, along which the railway track was launched. Construction began in the spring of 1944, and the first trains began to run across the strait in November. However, already in February next year the bridge supports were destroyed by ice floes.
In 1949 it was developed new project bridge - monumental and ambitious. It was supposed to be two-level, and at the beginning a giant statue of Stalin would be installed. The project was not implemented due to the high cost. Instead, in 1953, a ferry service began to operate.
A two-tier bridge project completed in 1949. Photo: kerch-most.ru
In the mid-90s, in the already independent Ukraine, several bridge projects were developed that could connect two separate states. In 1993, the Kyiv Institute "Soyuztransproekt" developed the bridge project. In 1995, the Krymenergoresursy company proposed a variant of a two-tier bridge - with a road and railroad track. The total cost of construction, taking into account the access roads, was $1.5-2 billion. The authors of the project assumed that in five or six years it could be recouped through paid travel.
Politicians liked to use the theme of the bridge across the Kerch Strait in their statements. In particular, the ex-mayor of Moscow Yuri Luzhkov. In 2001, with the participation of Luzhkov, Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea Leonid Grach, Head of the Crimean Cabinet of Ministers Sergei Kunitsyn, as well as the leadership of the Krasnodar Territory of Russia and the Kerch mayor, a memorial sign was unveiled in Kerch on “an agreement in principle to develop and implement a project for a multifunctional transport crossing through the Kerch Strait” . However, the investor for this project was never found.
The project of the bridge of the company "Krymenergoresursy". Photo: ru.krymr.com
In 2005, it was proposed to replace the bridge with a tunnel. The then government of the Crimea, headed by Anatoly Burdyugov, presented a project developed by the research and production company Expo. The main advantages of the tunnel in front of the bridge are resistance to the influence of atmospheric phenomena and minimization of harm to the ecology of the Sea of Azov. Opponents of the tunnel argued that the project would be significantly more expensive and more difficult to build and operate.
In April 2008, an agreement on the construction of the bridge was reached at the level of two governments. The then Prime Ministers of Russia and Ukraine Viktor Zubkov and Yulia Timoshenko spoke about their intentions.
With the coming to power of Viktor Yanukovych, the bridge construction project was talked about more and more actively. In October 2010, at a meeting between the head of Ukraine and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, the bridge construction project was considered and approved. It was supposed to be built by the start of Euro 2012. In December 2013, when Yanukovych came to Moscow after abandoning the association with the EU for a loan from Putin, the two presidents once again discussed building a bridge and reportedly agreed on “concrete steps.”
The construction of the bridge to Crimea began in 2014 after the annexation of the peninsula. In June, the Russian Federation approved the project of a bridge passing through the Tuzla Spit. Despite the fact that this option is longer, in Russia it was justified by several advantages at once. Firstly, in this case, it is possible to build more convenient transport interchanges, and secondly, more space for installing complex equipment. A significant role was played by the fact that with this option there will be no interference with the operation of the ferry crossing, which now connects Crimea with Russia.
Infographic about the selection of a site for the construction of the bridge, made by the contractor. Photo: most.life
The cost of the project of the St. Petersburg Institute Giprostroymost amounted to 280 billion rubles, or almost $3.5 billion. total length the bridge is planned to be 19 km, the height above sea level is 35 m.
The construction contract was awarded to the SGM-Most company, a subsidiary of Stroygazmontazh LLC, whose chairman of the board of directors is Arkady Rotenberg, one of a group of businessmen close to Vladimir Putin.
The construction of a bridge from Russia to the territory of the annexed peninsula did not go unnoticed by the United States. In September 2016, the US Department of the Treasury issued another list of companies against which sanctions are imposed. The list includes the bridge designers, the contractor and subcontractor, as well as the state customer - the Office of Federal highways"Taman".
The Sea of Azov has the status of an inland water body for the two countries, which is fixed in the Ukrainian-Russian agreement of 2003. For the construction of a structure in its water area, a formal permit from Ukraine is required. “It turns out funny: Crimea, based on the current legislation of the Russian Federation, “joined” Russia – but not the Kerch Strait! between the parties," writes journalist Valentina Samar in the article "The Invisible Corridor" for Zerkalo Nedeli.
Lawyer, maritime law expert and ex-government commissioner of Ukraine for the ECtHR Boris Babin believes that the government could do more to put diplomatic pressure on Russia for illegal construction. “There is an imitation of actions. In reality, they don’t exist,” Babin said in a commentary to Krym.Realii.
In 2016, according to official reports, 69 billion rubles were allocated for the construction of the bridge, which Updor Taman reported on December 28. Earlier, in the summer of the same year, information was received from Kerch that workers involved in the construction of the bridge were being detained wages and do not fully pay the promised. The fact that the financing of the construction of the Kerch bridge is going through with problems, in June 2016 .
The project is accompanied by powerful PR-support. The information support campaign for the bridge even received a specialized award in Russia for the best PR activity, writes V Krym. However, the bridge under construction has been criticized more than once by scientists and experts. Georgy Rosanovsky, the author of two bridge projects made in the 1990s, the chief engineer of the Soyuztransproekt company, is surprised at the choice of a site for construction across Tuzla.
“The geology is very bad here. The bottom is silty, bedrock at a depth of 80-90 meters. Everything above is layers of silty soils or soils a little stronger, but you can’t “plant” the foundations of supports on them, ”Rosanovsky said in an interview with Focus.
Rosanovsky also fears that the construction of the bridge will create a danger to ships passing through the strait. “Here the canal has curves, the ships will simply have little room to maneuver. When approaching bridge crossings, vessels must have steady rectilinear motion. Taxiing in a storm or darkness is not good,” he said.
The first accident on the still unfinished bridge occurred in March of this year. Turkish cargo ship Lira.
Yury Medovar, a senior researcher at the Institute of Water Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, agrees with Rosanovsky's opinion. “There is mud volcanism, there are six aquifers, and plus everything, there is karst. Where, as everyone is now explaining, will we hit the piles? Guys, you can’t beat anything there, ”he said.
Member of the Academy of Construction of Ukraine Petro Koval notes that the bridge is a seismically dangerous structure, as it is located at the site of a tectonic fault. “The requirements for seismic resistance of the structure were artificially reduced. And we know what kind of earthquakes were in Crimea,” he told Krym.Realii.
Russian expert, former director of the Leningrad hydroelectric power station, Yuri Sevenard, believes that the future bridge may pose a danger to cars due to strong hurricane winds and a high risk of road icing.
“There are very strong hurricane-force winds in this region, which can lead to emergencies with cars on the bridge with a length, we recall, as much as 19 km. Plus, ice phenomena are a frequent factor in conditions of temperature changes. Winds, high humidity, freezing rain (but icing can be without them) - all this is dangerous in terms of slipping transport, ”he said in an interview with Moskovsky Komsomolets.
One of the piles of the future bridge bent during installation. Photo: ankerch-crimea.ru
German bridge builder, professor at Dresden technical university Holger Svensson believes that the deadline for the completion of the bridge in 2018 is overly optimistic. “I'm not saying that it's impossible, especially if the Russian state wants it and doesn't stand up for the price… But the deadlines are very ambitious,” he said in an interview with Deutsche Welle.
At the moment, the builders of the bridge are finishing the construction of car access roads to the bridge from the western and east sides the strait and the land part of the crossing on the island of Tuzla. To drive piles on the offshore section of the track, workers built a temporary bridge. At the moment, the process of installing supports. The problem arose with the choice of a contractor for the construction of railway access roads to the bridge, Kommersant reports. Two attempts to organize a competition for these works have failed - there are no applicants.
If you find an error in the text, select it with the mouse and press Ctrl+Enter