Vanga's prediction when Syria will fall. Prediction about Syria. What will follow the fall of Syria? Vanga's predictions about Syria
Photos from open sources
The prophecies of the Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga were surprisingly accurate, her unique gift in foresight and telepathy was recognized even by prominent scientists of the last century. From the position today many of her predictions seem completely mystical, since they were fulfilled with accuracy in time and even in the smallest details of the events she saw. However, not all of Vanga's prophecies have come true. (website)
Syria
In her predictions of the impending Apocalypse for our civilization there is a kind of beacon - Syria, where global events have unfolded today, since the interests of almost all major powers intersect here. Vanga predicted back in the last century that Syria would become the center of events, which would be followed not only by the global crisis, but also by other catastrophes on a planetary scale.
Photos from open sources
According to Vanga, the fall of Syria will be a harbinger of the coming into the world of the Messiah and a new world order, ancient and wise, like the Earth itself or the Universe. And although Syria will fall at the feet of the winner, but the winner will not be the same.
Isn't it true, mysterious prophecies that are still difficult for us to interpret. But what is surprising about them is precisely that Vanga foresaw the turmoil in Syria, a series of Arab revolutions back in the nineties, when no one could have imagined such events in the Arab world.
Prediction for Europe and USA
That is why I want to remember what the soothsayer said about other topics that concern us. For example, long before the formation of the European Union, Vanga predicted that Europe would make desperate attempts to revive, but it would never succeed in rejuvenating itself. But after Barack Obama, America will accept a president who will understand that love is better than fear.
Unfortunately, Vanga did not reject the possibility of a third world war, she simply said that it would not be soon, since long-suffering Syria had not yet fallen.
Prediction about Russia
And then she added optimistically: everything will pass, melt like ice in spring, and only remain unshakable. This great territory will once again take shape into an empire, only now into an empire of the spirit, and will subjugate the whole world, soaring over the Earth like an eagle.
Today it’s hard for us to believe in all this, but in Russia there are amazing places of power, among which we can name Baikal, Altai, Kamchatka, the Caucasus ... Getting into these parts, you feel all the power of this huge power, time seems to stop here, and the energy of the Earth fills the body strength, and the spirit - wisdom. It is here that it is so easy to believe in all the predictions about Russia by a blind Bulgarian seer.
In 2011, NTV hosted the program “Vanga returns”, and in 2013 the video “If tomorrow Vanga” appeared. The authors of the project claim that unknown predictions have surfaced in private archives. It seems that when Syria falls, the Third World War begins, there will be an apocalypse, Europe will become empty, and Russia will be saved.
Nothing to say, interesting video. Disturbing music, dynamically changing frames. Satanovsky, Ivashov, Korotchenko and other famous people flash on the screen ... but they are not talking about Vanga. But the effect is good. And given the recent events in Syria and Europe, one can believe in the apocalypse.
But first you need to find out what the soothsayer actually said. And this is more difficult, because the phrases are taken from different sources. If, for example, it is an obvious fake, then there are doubts. Therefore, I will go over the quotes and, as always, I will try to find the primary sources:
“2011 will be special, people will change, the whole world will change”, “Chemical rain will fall in the north, from which all living things will die”, “ Chemical weapon”, “2016, empty Europe”, “When Europe is empty, no one will live there.” All this is clearly from here:
The list has been circulating on the Internet for many years, and, by the way, flashes in an NTV video. That Vanga's predictions over the years- fake pure water I will write separately. She didn’t say anything like that, and in general, this is Nostradamus. Then I’ll tell you where the list came from, and from what time they began to attribute it to Vanga.
“Not soon, Syria has not yet fallen.” Allegedly, this is how Vanga answered the question of when the Third World War would begin. In fact, this sentence was torn out of a completely different context. The full phrase is in the book "The Truth about Vanga" (1997), which was written by her niece Krasimira Stoyanova, on page 162:
"As soon as Syria falls, wait great war between West and East”, “In the spring a war will begin in the East, and there will be a Third World War”, “War in the East that destroyed the West”. Wang didn't say that. And in general, friends and relatives of the soothsayer have repeatedly argued that she never predicted the Third world war. Here is an excerpt from an interview from a Bulgarian website:
And here is a quote from Vanga's Encyclopedia (1998-2002), it can be found in volume 2, on page 161. This is a fragment of an interview that Vanga gave to Russian journalist Sergei Kostorny in 1995.
"Syria will collapse at the feet of the winner, but the winner will not be the same." This phrase is in the book of Nadezhda Dimova “Vanga. The Secret of the Gift of the Bulgarian Cassandra” (2007). But the author refers to Anatoly Lubchenko, who allegedly has an audio recording of the last interview of the soothsayer. Whether to believe the Ukrainian businessman, decide for yourself. But this is the original. Here is the full quote:
“The apocalypse will come”, “Evil will break out from under the earth and destroy everything”, “Only Russia will be saved, not everything”, “In Russia there will be both water and peace”. Vanga really said something like that, and this is confirmed by many sources, all of them cannot be listed here, and it is not necessary. Here, for example, is a fragment from the same NTV video:
And this is from another video. The Bulgarian artist and writer Petr Bakov, who knew Vanga well, says about the same thing. True, something about Europe also surfaced there, but a separate material should be prepared about this. In the meantime, a small snippet:
“It will be bad to live evil”, “Stop! Stop the race… money, weapons”, “Evil will return, there will be trouble”, “After the end of the world, only those who get rid of anger and envy, who can become different”, “Nothing will save, no escape to other countries, no money …only purity from the inside.” But you can't argue with this. And it doesn't matter if Vanga said something like that.
Let's summarize. It turns out that Vanga said practically nothing about Syria. The phrase "Syria has not yet fallen" can mean anything or nothing at all. World War III is also cancelled. The apocalypse, however, is in question, but it seems to be postponed for the time being.
But as for Europe... Yes, it will not be empty by 2016, there will be no chemical rains and a big war between the West and the East. It is clear that Vanga did not predict anything of the kind. But the situation there is complicated. Looks like they're still in for some trouble.
Here are some possible scenarios. If it starts erupting yellowstone volcano explosion provoke serious cataclysms, including in Europe. If the level of the World Ocean rises by several meters, many European capitals will be under water. Yes, you never know what else. Crisis, refugees... So Vanga said... However, I will write about this separately.
The war in Syria and in general everything that is happening now in the Middle East has already gone beyond the usual understanding. It is difficult, or even impossible, to rationally understand the causes of the bloody chaos that threatens to drag the whole of humanity with it. No need to be tall analytical skills to understand what a fateful time we live in, and that the world in the near future may change beyond recognition.
Willy-nilly, thoughts come to turn to predictions, and a lot of them have already accumulated. We will not take into account the vague quatrains of Nasterdamus, which, in fact, can be adapted to any event and any date. We will take into account only specific predictions that are clearly tied to place and time.
Let's start with the famous Vanga. Now there is a lot of talk about the fact that Vanga did not have any gift, that she worked for the Bulgarian special services, which supplied her with information about people coming to her (the queue was long). Only here it is not necessary to confuse the cause with the effect. Yes, Baba Vanga was made a popular brand and they tried to use it for their own purposes. But she had the gift of foresight. Only he was given to her not in order to tell thousands of people about their fate. For this, you can turn to the gypsies. Vanga was given the Great Gift of predictions. Forces unknown to us whispered to her what threatens humanity in the future, so that it could avoid tragedies and the death of innocent people.
It was only because of her lack of education that she understood these voices literally - the way they sounded. So she broadcast, as she could convey in her own words what she saw and heard. The only pity is that no one bothered to deeply analyze her predictions in due time. Our bright minds only laughed at my grandmother, not trying to understand the essence of her words.
1980 Vanga says: At the end of the century, in the year 2000 or a year earlier, Kursk will sink, and the whole world will shed tears.“Baba Vanga has completely gone crazy,” the “wise men” laughed. “There are hundreds of kilometers to the nearest sea, how can a whole city drown?”
What happens next. In 1992, in Severodvinsk, the construction of a nuclear submarine missile-carrying cruiser of the Antey project under the name K-141 Kursk began. At the end of 1994, it was put into operation as part of the Russian Northern Fleet. August 10, 2000 "Kursk" goes to sea for firing according to the plan of exercises of the Northern Fleet. At 11:28 a.m., a torpedo exploded on the submarine. The boat sank. All crew members were killed. Not funny anymore, right? And if the submarine had been given a different name from the very beginning, who knows, maybe it saved many lives, and the number of Vanga's correct predictions decreased. Maybe this was the purpose of the Great Gift - to give people a chance to save innocent souls?
1989 Another vision of Vanga: Horror, horror. American friends will fall, iron birds will bring them death. The wolves will howl their long songs from behind the bushes, and the blood of the innocent will spill without quantity. And in 2001, there was an attack by al-Qaeda terrorists on the famous twin brothers skyscrapers in New York. Four passenger airliners were hijacked by suicide bombers, two of them crashed into skyscrapers, one into the Pentagon building, another fell into a field, it is assumed that he was also heading for the Pentagon. Thousands of people died!
Vanga also has a prophecy about Syria, made in 1980, but it is difficult to understand its true meaning. Here are her words: Hard times will come. People will be divided on the basis of faith. An ancient teaching will come into the world. Will that time come soon? No, not soon. Syria has not fallen yet! Syria will collapse at the feet of the winner, but the winner will be the wrong one!
So Syria must fall, but does this mean that ISIS Islamists will win in Syria? Hardly. Before whom should Syria fall and, more importantly, why the winner will not be the same? How is the ancient teaching connected with the war in Syria? As many years ago, it is difficult to understand the essence of these predictions, and perhaps the meaning of the message is distorted by the translation. It is easy to say after many years that Kursk is not a city, but a submarine, iron birds are captured passenger liners, the howl of wolves is the roar of sirens, etc. Again, the message sent to people for their salvation remains unread.
Only one more prediction of Vanga consoles: Everything will disappear like smoke, only one thing will remain indestructible for all ages - the glory of Russia and its greatness. And continuation: Russia has given a lot to the world, it has made so many sacrifices. Now her time is coming, now Russia will rule the world. There are no more rivals and enemies for her. The glory and power of Russia will spread for centuries.
Syria will collapse- She's really falling apart. Collapsed by ISIS, who destroy monuments, temples and entire cities. Syria has almost collapsed at the feet of Islamist radicals.
But the winner won't be the same- Syrian ruins at the feet of ISIS fighters, but they are not the winners. Through the efforts of Russia, the world will be cleansed of evil - this is THAT winner.
Read
The aggravation of the situation around Syria and the statements of a number of Western countries about their readiness for a military operation against it caused a flurry of voices that Russia is now "merging" Syria as well. Some, however, spoke more cautiously in the sense that "if it merges, then ...". Further conclusions followed, one more amusing than the other. “Putin is an agent of the State Department”, “Power sells everyone and everything” and so on in the same vein. Especially all these heartbreaking cries intensified after Minister Lavrov's statement appeared on the Web and in the media that Russia is not going to fight with anyone because of Syria.
I am absolutely not going to dissuade or convince anyone of anything, especially since I am not going to present to your attention a kind of loyal text, which is designed to convince that Russia is the coolest of all and everything is done correctly, that a resounding victory awaits us ahead. I’m not going to, because, like the vast majority of my readers, I don’t know what exactly our government thinks about this matter, and what exactly it is going to do in this situation, for what reasons and for what purposes.
I only propose to analyze together the calmly current situation, known, I emphasize, to us only from open and incomplete sources, and to consider those real opportunities that, based on our picture of the world, are available to our authorities. We cannot know whether the authorities will take advantage of these opportunities, whether they will find better and more effective ones, or whether they are not going to do anything at all. But such a debriefing, at least, will allow us to get rid of unnecessary illusions and realize the real threats that today's Russia is confronted with.
Moreover, we will do this as far as possible from the authorities themselves, since in its actions today on any issue you can see so many different contradictions that both its adherent and any opponent can easily find a thousand serious arguments in defense of their position. We will look only at the world situation and Russia in it, looking from our "trenches".
So let's go:
Why Syria at all, what did the destroyers need there?
On the topic of Syria and the potential reasons that pushed the West to, even if still carried out by proxy, direct aggression against a sovereign and peaceful country, over the almost three years that this war has been going on, various political scientists and analysts have said a lot of words and put forward many versions. I will name those that seem to me the most essential and rational (not connected with mysticism of various kinds):
Syria objectively opposes the creation of a unified Middle Eastern Sunni Caliphate.
The victory in Syria finally removes Russia from the Mediterranean basin, in which its important events are outlined around the possession of Leviathan, part of which, by the way, Syria itself claims.
The most convenient route of the pipeline system for pumping Qatari gas to Europe runs through Syria. Control over Syria is the control of these flows.
Syria is Iran's only serious ally in the region. Moreover, an attack on Iran is physically impossible without the elimination of the current government in Syria. More precisely, it is possible only from the sea and from the Persian Gulf. The Gulf War threatens to completely block oil supplies from the region, an attack only from the sea does not guarantee anything, and an Israeli attack rests on Syria's air defense and radar systems, which detects an attack long before the borders of Iran.
Syria is very convenient to use, albeit forcedly, to begin the process of eliminating Israel. It is no coincidence that Assad, in response to the announcement of a possible attack on Syria, named Israel as the first retaliatory targets. Nowhere else can its missiles physically reach. Except perhaps in the border regions of Turkey, which, in terms of the soreness of the reaction, are incomparable goals.
In principle, what has been named is enough for the West, within the framework of “ Arab Spring" showed a great desire to convey "democracy to the downtrodden Syrian people."
Why does Russia need Syria, why do we cling so stubbornly to the preservation of its current power?
To understand why Russia needs Syria, and why our government reacted so calmly to the destruction of Libya, but stubbornly continues to resist a similar scenario in Syria with all available means, we should consider the general geostrategic concept that the West is implementing in the Middle East.
The ultimate goal of the world behind the scenes, moving Western power pawns, is in Russia. I will not argue that the goal is precisely the destruction of Russia. This is just one of the options. The goal is complete control of Russia along with its nuclear potential. To do this, for the third time in our written history, the same scenario is being implemented - to envelop Russia in a hostile arc from the south. The first time it was an attempt by Alexander the Great, acting on the instructions of his teacher and one of the dark priests of Aristotle. The second attempt was made by Hitler. The third one is being prepared now. Why is the south so important? Repeated attempts to attack Russia from the West were unsuccessful. Dog-knights, Napoleon, Hitler, they all not only suffered defeat, but also brought our troops with them on a mission of revenge on the territory of Europe itself. These painful lessons are unlikely to ever be forgotten. Of course, an attempt to use spoiling us not our own troops, but bought Slavs from Poland and now also Ukraine, cannot be ruled out, their puppeteers are not sorry, but the proximity of the root European territory is very annoying and cools hot heads. Everything is easier in the south. Firstly, Muslims are not sorry, both behind the scenes and the Muslims themselves, who are easily amenable to mass brainwashing by religious postulates. Secondly, unlike the European direction, the southern direction is much longer, and it is impossible in principle to close all borders tightly. For this, no troops are enough. Thirdly, the convenient defense lines of the southern borders are located not on the territory of Russia itself, but on the territory of the Central Asian states, which makes them an order of magnitude more permeable. As a result, we can potentially get a single arc of military confrontation from North Caucasus(through Georgia and potentially Azerbaijan) to Pakistan. And even the possible use of tactical nuclear charges does not guarantee an easy victory, not to mention the choice of places to hit. On your own territory? By the Central Asian states that let their co-religionists in from the south? Or by the southern states themselves? And how many of these charges will be needed?
What gives behind the scenes control over Russia? He gives her nothing less than control of China, the last independent power on our planet to have a say. Up to compulsion to obedience through nuclear destruction. The backstage does not care about a retaliatory strike against Russia. Not mine. In the event that Russia, even surrounded on all sides by enemies, refuses to submit, then a plan to destroy it with an attack from the south and a simultaneous attempt to take control of Russia's nuclear potential by Western special forces will come into play. The result is the encirclement of China from all sides with coercion or destruction. That is, the same target option.
So far, the potential implementation of this plan is constrained by the presence of an independent and stubbornly resisting external pressure of Iran, the weakness of Georgia after 888 and the controversial situation in Iraq after the collapse of the massive American contingent. But if Iran collapses, all these problems are solved quickly enough. On the reasons for the impossibility of an attack on Iran without the destruction of Syria, see above.
There is one more argument. Preparing a serious fighter is not easy. It takes time, money and a special psyche that only a certain percentage of people have. The more of those who die in Syria now, the weaker will be their onslaught on Russia if something happens, when, God forbid, it comes to that. This is exactly what Assad is doing. It has been successfully performing for the third year in a row, grinding one horde after another and blowing away the billions invested in them.
The third reason why Russia supports Assad so stubbornly is timing. The longer the Assad regime resists behind-the-scenes mercenaries, the better Russia itself can prepare for its near-inevitable involvement in the war at a later stage.
Can Russia protect Syria? All screamers who scream about the surrender of Syria by Russia should spread a large map on the table (to take a closer look at the features) and present themselves as the greatest commander of all times and peoples. And try to counteract aggression with your own military force. The mere absence of common borders between Russia and Syria makes its effective defense impossible. More precisely, with the help of the supply of our weapons, a certain number of “volunteer instructors” from Russia and Iran, Assad and the Syrian army are successfully coping with those disparate Mujahideen and “wild geese” that the backstage has gained from the world with the money of Arab sheikhs. More is not required. But he will not survive a serious war with the Western coalition either alone, or with the support of Russia and Iran in any form. And he knows it very well.
One can simply estimate what Russia can oppose to the West in a military sense. nuclear war we won’t start yet, it’s still not the edge, but otherwise we don’t have so many resources. Even a squadron assembled from a pine forest from three fleets cannot do anything at the start of a really serious conflict. More precisely, it can, but it will not save her. Let's even imagine that our glorious Navy will sink three times more ships enemy than sink itself. So, what is next? And then the West still has dozens of ships of different classes and unlimited opportunities for their production around the world, and our combat-ready fleet is already at the bottom. There is nothing more to fight. Dealt with the fleet.
Now let's take aviation. From the nearest potential base from which our planes can take off, in Armenia, to Damascus is just over a thousand kilometers. Fuel tanks back and forth. And how to fight? Yes, and blocking this base in Armenia is not so difficult. Aviation is out.
What do we have left? Infantry and armored vehicles? Well, the West does not intend to descend to the land of Syria. He has enough air. On the ground, the Mujahideen will finish the work when the army is bombed. With our troops or separately, it does not matter. The result is predictable.
To completely complete this topic, let's talk about air defense. It is not bad in Syria, ours and quite modern. Whether or not the S-300 is there is a question, as well as whether it is needed there from the point of view of strategy. Air defense alone does not achieve victory. To thin out the enemy in the air is enough of what is. Is it necessary to shine the S-300 in order to add a dozen or two aircraft to the downed ones, but already completely illuminate the interception technology? I don't have a clear answer to this. Not an expert. If there is such a risk, then it is easier for Assad to get by with additional batteries of the same Buk, since the distance in this region does not greatly affect anything. All enemy bases will be nearby.
What can Russia oppose in response to aggression in Syria? Even a superficial analysis of the situation around Syria shows that if the backstage resists, completely stops accepting arguments and attacks Syria, then Russia will not be able to keep it from this step. Or you will have to give so much more somewhere in something else that these options are not considered at all. A direct response in the form of entry into the war for Russia is also impossible. Just disassembled. What is left for us? And it remains for us to seek and find any asymmetric responses to these challenges. And, apparently, we have options for such answers. Yesterday's post, in the words of Brzezinski, who has never been seen in dovishness, suggests that not everything is smooth and easy there.
The most interesting thing is that it seems that Russia is already hinting at such options. Today's information that we can stop deliveries of RD-170 rocket engines to the United States, without which not a single American rocket with satellites will take off, says a lot. Even more obvious is the answer in the financial sector. Not even to take away those unfortunate figures already drawn for Russia in the computers of Western banks. And in refusing to continue to finance their economy. I am sure that the same China will support us in this charitable cause. The result may be a powerful financial crisis, after which it will be possible to forget about the talks about economic recovery, overcoming the crisis and islands of stability forever. Yes, in this case we will have a hard time on our own, and I am not ready to say that such a powerful drug, sending the entire world economy into a deep knockout, will definitely be used precisely in response to an attack in Syria. Painfully irrevocable step for all mankind comparable to a massive nuclear strike. But there may be other less radical steps in the same vein. Prohibition of transit from Afghanistan while funding "guerrillas" on the Pakistani transit route. What is not an option. I am sure that the relevant specialists have dozens of such.
What will have to be done in Iran, and how will the situation in Iran differ from the situation in Syria? But in Iran, unlike Syria, we will have to behave radically differently. And not only to us, but, apparently, to China. If we disappear, then no one and nothing will save China. And he knows it. If Iran falls, then war in our south becomes inevitable and very close. In this situation, it becomes simply pointless to play for time. In Iran, we will have to fight like adults, with all our strength and means. Fortunately, there is a common border across the Caspian. That's where the time will come for the S-300 and other weapons systems known and unknown to the general public.
Brief summary. Leaving aside emotions or attempts to form a very specific pre-set opinion in ourselves or the audience, we can see what Russia in Syria is doing and continues to do the maxim of what is right and meaningful. We cannot save Syria, but we can and we are trying to play for time. Time is a very important factor. Crisis phenomena in the West are growing like a snowball despite all attempts to verbally confuse millions of suckers interested in this process all over the world. And no matter how much the rope winds, the end of this show is already near and can even be seen. So every day won is already a victory. And this is exactly how it should be treated. To be honest, I'm just amazed at how long Assad managed to hold out. At least a year longer than I expected. This is truly heroism. Him, his family, the Syrian army and the entire Syrian people, who refused to bow their heads obediently and die meekly, as they were prescribed by the Western scenario. Here they just showed an example of true Jihad and the struggle for faith. They, and not those who oppose them, hiding behind faith in Allah. Glory to them who died and glory to them who are still alive.
And how many times over the years the hope has risen that Syria has survived. A little more and she will win. But the backstage has already backed itself into a corner and cannot retreat. To abandon the war in Syria means to show your weakness, and this is immediate death. the death of the power of power based on fear, and the death of the power of the dollar based on power. Most likely, they will fight for their power to the last. And yet, the world opposed behind the scenes has already won. Already forced the West to enter the war directly. This is a sign of weakness, not strength. The West, led behind the scenes, is weakening and more and more forced to rely on manifest, and not on hidden power, as it was centuries before. And any obvious force has its weak points, which can and should be hit, destroying it entirely.
REX IA expert, journalist Aleksey Sidorenko
I think that before September 10, volatility in the market should increase. In the event of a UWB attack on Syria before the G20 summit, most likely (especially if the Pindos crap) Obama will not fly to St. Petersburg. This will be a huge mistake for the West, because there will be two newsmakers at this summit - Russia and China. Agreements will be announced on the most important issues of interaction: military cooperation, energy (Gazprom will be affected, which will accelerate the growth of prices for its shares), geopolitical cooperation. Everyone will be shown that Pindostan is no longer a monopoly on super important news and that everything can be solved without UWB. Everyone will see that there is no Obama and ... nothing has changed (what is, what is not), that the Pindos, it seems, are not really needed to solve important issues of world civilization. If there is no strike before the summit and Obama arrives in Russia, then we will still see that Russia and China will become the center of attention. See above. Only journalists or someone else can start asking Obama uncomfortable questions and do not forget that our president is a graduate of not only Leningrad University, but also high school The KGB of the USSR, and there people were taught to do very serious nasty things to opponents. Therefore, I expect that during the summit there may be news waves not in favor of our American "friends". If Obama fails to put pressure on Putin and he understands (or he is directly told) that the freebie is over and he will no longer look into his mouth and no longer lick his ass, then immediately after the summit, you can expect the start of air defense bombings in Syria. This is where the fun begins.
You can not believe the first statements of the Pindos, and no matter how the bombing goes, they will still say that everything is buzzing and they destroyed the air defense of Syria. Therefore, on the first trading day after the impact, the dollar will rise, oil will rise, the American market will begin to grow, the last uncuts from our securities (Gazprom, Rosneft, Sberbank, Lukoil) may come out, like, and then all of you will also be fucked. But in a day or two, real information about Syrian losses will go out, or the Jews will try to probe the Syrian air defense, or simply decide to bomb Damascus a little (maybe we’ll hit Assad). And now, if the adversary’s aviation begins to suffer losses or more, if the Syrians suddenly manage to get at least one Pondos or Jewish ship with Onyx or similar missile systems, then a backlash will begin. The dollar will start a long-term downtrend. And in general, for the UWB, this war can be the beginning of the end, as the empire of the West and the stronghold of all satanic Western forces (with all their GMOs, the wedding of pederasts, juvenile justice, etc.). If the issue of Syria settles down and it becomes clear that the Pindos with all sorts of Qatars, Saudis and Bahrains does not shine, then you can safely buy our oil industry and Gazik. This will mean that no gas and oil pipelines from the aforementioned Wahhabis will be laid through Syria. At least for the next 15 years. This is my view on the upcoming events in the world, which are likely to become the main drivers of movements in the markets. The strength of technical analysis and generally economic conditions will be much reduced in the next 3 weeks.