Why Russian officials are not afraid to steal budget money? Corruption is an “honor”: why they steal in Russia Do officials steal

Because officials are not only not the most stupid people, but also not the most indifferent to material wealth. And, it goes without saying, at heart officials are the same businessmen. Oligarchs, billionaires, even respectable dollar millionaires have their own banks, their own business, and, as you know, you can’t steal from yourself. Although, it is possible that, over the years, society simply forgot (or reconciled?) When and how much was stolen from the state, from the people, before becoming billionaires and millionaires.
And the officials have retained the ability to do business, although they just don’t have their own business, or they are even forbidden to do it. And, as you know, living is good, and living well is even better. That's stealing from the state. (Maybe the people, but the people are poor and silent). Officials believed, made sure that, unlike Soviet times, you can take a lot, usually with impunity ("wild capitalism"), they got a taste, so they "take" without blushing.
Officials have always, at all times, stolen: this is the position. In Russia, they have always been able to steal. Even under absolutism they stole. (For example, Menshikov under Peter the Great, although the tsar seemed to be sincerely angry and said: “Everything is mine!” They agreed, obsequiously, bowing low: “Yours, yours, tsar-father!”, And then continued to steal even more skillfully. Peter, even after the victorious Poltava, only thirty percent of all taxes reached the state treasury. What is the Peter's era! Deeds and theft of bygone days! ... And in our time, neither absolutism nor Stalinism is possible, and even unnecessary - how can a free society be without theft?.. Did they steal under Brezhnev? Yes. Was the communist nomenklatura corrupt in moderation? - yes. Did the people steal in cities and towns? Yes, but also in moderation. And when in moderation ("takes, carries a little"), then it was not considered theft. And yet, the people said: "The Communists themselves stole, and others were not prevented from stealing.
Why don't they steal in the West? Firstly, who knows how they steal there?.. Maybe "everything was stolen before us," that is, a long time ago, during the lifetime of the grandfathers and great-grandfathers of today's "honest" Europeans?.. But didn't Zhirinovsky say: Russia is not Europe?.. Perhaps in Europe, in the same Germany, the pressure of the popular masses, trade unions from below is much stronger than in Russia - no one denies this. Embezzlement in tsarist Russia has always flourished: both in the time of Peter the Great and before the Crimean War. Before this war, embezzlement and bribery reached a shockingly large scale, and bribery was generally taken for granted by both sides - not only by the takers, but also by the givers. And the reason lay on the surface: the underdevelopment of bourgeois relations, absolutism, the non-emancipation of the third estate, that is, the bourgeoisie. ("In Russia they always knew how to steal") ...
And what, now bourgeois relations are developed? Previously, there was accelerated industrialization, now there is an accelerated development of bourgeois relations ... And even the fact that the Russian bourgeoisie (and in the CIS) is a comprador is also important when it comes to corruption, banal plunder.
It is true that private property is sacred and inviolable, but this does not mean at all that bribery and theft from public pockets are also "sacred and inviolable."

Reviews

Theft from mankind has been considered the norm from time immemorial. Europe is still fattening, having plundered half the world, having approved it with its colonies. They also seized the whole continent by force of arms, destroying the peoples living there, and capturing their natural wealth. Yes, and we also expanded into Siberia. Fortunately, it was sparsely populated, otherwise they would have cut it too. And now we live off of it. So it's okay to take someone else's. It turns out that honesty is not in honor.
Thank you!

Here's what's interesting: practically no one argues with the fact that officials steal.
And with the fact that they steal a lot - in general, too.

And how can you argue here, if almost everything is in plain sight?

Expensive cars and country cottages of "servants of the people" against the background of chronically broken roads, dilapidated and dilapidated housing, regular accidents and other problems speak for themselves.

And the billions found at the governor's Sakhalin region Khoroshavin, laid out throughout the house, right in the boxes - all confirm this. And not only Khoroshavin was caught on the outrageous theft. Yurchenko was suspended, Belykh was detained with a suitcase of cash. The Vasilyeva-Serdyukov case, again. Many other cases also confirm that officials steal and steal a lot.

Even if we sum up only the cases brought to court with proven facts of theft, we will get tens and hundreds of billions of rubles stolen from the budget. This is the proven part. But there is also something unproven. According to the same Vasilyeva. According to the same Serdyukov.

And how many of those who were not brought to trial at all, were not removed, but who still steal?

It is clear that the list of corrupt officials does not end with Khoroshavin, Vasilyeva and other detainees, but barely begins. And the total amount of theft is much more proven in the courts.

Some are still trying to stand up for the purity of the public procurement system or for the reasonableness of the cost of the Sochi Olympiad, but these are individual guardians. Their zeal can be attributed either to party discipline, or to simple dementia, when a person argues according to the principle "I liked it - then everything is fine."

But in general, almost everyone agrees that theft is of a large-scale and systematic nature, that it has spread throughout the entire "vertical".

Because it cannot be that Khoroshavin has been stealing billions for many years, and everyone around was clean. That doesn't happen. Unbeknownst to the rest, you can steal once or twice, you can quietly drain fuel from a state-owned car, squander travel allowances and forge a report. But it is impossible to steal billions for many years unnoticed, for this you need accomplices, many, in different departments, which will also have their accomplices.

And since most of the theft is carried out within the framework of federal legislation, which is the same for all regions, it is very naive to think that Khoroshavin found ways to steal, while others did not find or did not want to use them.

In all regions, officials have found ways to steal. It's just that not everyone has become as insolent as Khoroshavin. And not everyone was decided to be removed, because the vertical will collapse if everyone is removed in a row.

And everyone understands this. Or almost everything.

But here's the phenomenon - with all the understanding of the above, half of the country continues to think that Putin is good, that he fights thieves, protects Russia, and so on and so forth.

The king is good, the boyars are bad.

Sometimes they say so directly - Putin is fighting the liberal environment, corrupt officials, crooks and thieves ...

Sometimes even in reports on corruption (for example, in the Moment of Truth), after a frank gesture about large-scale theft is shown on the screen, the presenter makes a phenomenal conclusion like "but Putin is well done, because ..."

Why is he great?

Because he created the ONF and regularly says the right words about the fight against corruption?

So it's just words. These words are specifically said so that everyone thinks that Putin is fighting corruption at a time when he simply sits and watches what is happening. Looks after the law to steal.

Putin's speeches are just words for everything good against everything bad. Exactly the same words as about the need to stop the shelling of Donbass and implement the Minsk agreements. Words that do not change anything and do not make it easier for anyone.

This is the word "halva", from the repetition of which it does not become sweeter.

And if you figure it out, then in fact this is the phrase "stop the thief", which the thief himself says, so that no one thinks of him and everyone catches others.

With words about the fight against corruption, Putin simply diverts suspicion from himself and removes responsibility. Like he knows everything, he is aware, he is against corruption.

Yes, he does not really mind - he is part of it.

He is part of United Russia, about the creation of which he himself spoke, recently speaking at the congress. And he even said that he created this party at the beginning of the 2000s, although this is not true. But the main thing is that Putin has publicly recognized himself as part of United Russia.

And for several years he was the chairman of this party, although he was not a member. And most of the governors, heads of departments, Putin appointed from among United Russia. He surrounded himself with United Russia and liberals, crooks and thieves, with whom he allegedly fights.

What does this mean?

If the commander-in-chief surrounds himself with an enemy, then he either surrenders, or this is not an enemy for him at all.

But if Putin wanted to give up, he probably wouldn't come back after the castling with Medvedev. And he returned.

So United Russia, liberals, crooks and thieves for Putin are not enemies, not strangers, but their own. And he is for them. It is no coincidence that Putin is so actively supported by all members of United Russia.

Agree that crooks and thieves would not support the president who is actually fighting them.

They support each other - Putin's United Russia, and Putin United Russia.
Support from the first day and until now, support publicly and essentially.

Putin calls the actions of the government correct, and the decisions of the Central Bank are correct, United Russia obediently votes for the laws that are written in the presidential administration (for example, the law on the National Guard). With Medvedev, Putin generally has complete mutual understanding, friendship and cooperation. Actually, Putin himself promoted it.

There is no Putin's fight against corruption.

There is a struggle with individual representatives who have become insolent, stole and began to spoil the furrow.

And there is also the sacrifice of individual corrupt officials to the public in order to calm the people and the rest could safely steal further.

It's like a leader who sometimes kills weak, sick or disobedient wolves from the pack, and the rams rejoice and think that he represents their interests.

No, he simply strengthens his power in the pack and maintains his authority among the rams, which allows him to keep the herd grouping without resorting to forceful methods.

However, it is not entirely correct to compare Putin and United Russia with wolves. Lots of honor.

It's not wolves - it's shit.

Our so-called ilitka, post-Soviet and already even post-Eltsin, in a jump changed into Western liberal shoes and formed the United Russia party - this is real shit.

And all this shit came out of the same asshole into which the late USSR turned (well, or was turned, how to look at it).

And since all this shit came out of one asshole and formed an even, decorated heap, called United Russia, then where could a cherry appear at the very top of this pile?

Where a dung beetle could appear on a pile of shit - I can understand. Where a fly can come from - I can understand. Where can a cherry stone come from - and I can understand it.

And where a cherry, a rose or a bee can appear on a pile of shit - I can’t understand.

This does not happen - it is unnatural, contrary to the laws of nature.

Therefore, do not tell me that everyone steals, but Putin is good at the same time.

An attempt to prove that everyone steals, but Putin is good - this is actually a manifestation of fear of losing faith in a good king. This is the subconscious fear of sheep to look at a leader without a mask and see a wolf. This is the fear of parting with the hope that everything will work out by itself, a kind and wise tsar will defeat the bad and thieving boyars and life will become beautiful. By her own. And for this you do not have to get up from the warm couch.

Those who believe in a good Putin are simply afraid to face the truth, afraid of reality, afraid to see ahead instead of great victory Putin, his miserable and insignificant end, deplorable for Russia, the result of his reign.

And the whole cunning plan is the same attempt to escape from reality, a passionate desire to believe that everything will work itself out and Russia will become great, by itself, at the behest of the pike and the king’s will, and for this you don’t need to move, just stay on the couch and stick in Kiselev, believe in a cunning plan and a good Putin, listen to Svanidze's tales and everything will be.

No, it will not.

Nothing will happen by itself.

And Russia will not become great by itself, because 86% are sitting on the couch, believing in a good Putin and his cunning plan, sticking in Kiselev, Solovyov, Svanidze and others.

Russia will become great, but the path to this will lie as in the past - through mud and blood, through cleaning the Augean stables into which power has become, through raking the shit that the Russian helika represents together with United Russia, Putin and his entourage, through raking the manure they leave behind.

And sitting on the couch is not going to work.

Moreover, the longer you sit and believe in a good Putin and a cunning plan, the stronger your bummer will be when Putin runs away or simply surrenders like Yeltsin, after which it suddenly turns out that there was no cunning plan, no fight against corruption there was, there was no protection for Russia, but there was only a lie, a translation of arrows, nonsense for everything good against everything bad and the consistent sale of Russia to internal enemies, which are much more dangerous than external ones.

But don't think that I'm calling on anyone to come out and change Putin - by no means.

We will not change Putin - this is not in our power and it is not our business at all.

Sooner or later it will be replaced without us.

Perhaps he will even run away himself, although personally I am in Putin's ability to independent decisions I do not believe. But not the point.

I am not calling on anyone to change Putin. I just want you to let go of your illusions about him. Just so that you do not fall into a deep and protracted prostration when you see that the king, figuratively speaking, was naked all this time.

Because when everything happens - it will not be possible to sit and lament about how bad everything is, how we were deceived, how we believed him and how he really turned out - there will be no time for this. It will be necessary to roll up your sleeves to rake the shit piled up by Putin and United Russia.

PRHVMYLPCHBOP 10.10.2016 BCFPTPN zTYZPTYK rPMHLFCH

h UFTBOE LTYYYU OILPNKh PVYASUOSFSH OE OBDP. oBTPD OYEBEF, YUYOPCHOYLY, DERHFBFSCH, PMYZBTIY OE OBAF LHDB DECHBFSH IBMSCHOSCHE NYMMYPOSHCH. LFP OE UZMBUEO U FBLIN ЪBSCHMEOYEN RPYUYFBKFE UVBFSHA h.DELFETYCHB "ZDE DEOSHZY, DYN?" CH ZBEFE "rTBChDB" No. 107 LFPZP ZPDB. ZMBCHOSCHK VPTEG U LPTTHRGYEK - NYOYUFT CHOKHFTEOOYI DEM, YUEMPCHEL BLTSCHFSHCHK DMS OBTPDB. EZP OEF OYZDE. th NPF ON GENERAL BEF OBYVPMEE LPTTTHNRITCHBOOSCHE UZHETCH DEFEMSHOPUFY H ZPUHDBTUFCHE. FP ZPUBLKHRLY, UFTPIFEMSHUFCHP, DDTBCHPPITBOOEOYE Y LHMSHFKhTB. LFP EZP RTPUYM PVP-OBYUYFSH ZMBCHOSHI LPTTHRGIPOETCH? According to RPRBM Ch NPMPLP. fBL PGEOYCHBAF RPMYGEKULPZP EUMY PO OE HNEEF UFTEMSFSH. b ZDE RPMYGYS, ZDE ZMBCHOSCHE VPTGSC U LPTTHRGYEK, LPFPTSHCHE CHPSF H UCHPYI BCHFPNPVYMSI NYMMMYBTDSCH? b ZDE UMEDUFCHEOOOSCHK LPNYFEF, UPFTKHDOILY LPFPTPZP PZTBVYMY 166 FSHCHUSYU UPVUFCHEOOILPCH. pV FFPN ЪBSCHYM ABOUT UPCHEEBOY RTEYIDEOF. ON OBCHBM GYZHTH CH RTPGEOFBI. LFP - FP YOYI UEM YMYY VSCHM HCHPMEO? oBPVPTPF RPMYFYLB ZPUHDBTUFCHB OBRTBCHMEOB ABOUT UPITBOEOYE CHPTCHULPK MYFSCH. 360 OBYM st. b NPTSEF CHETOHM NYMMMYBTDSCH, HLTBDEOOOSCHE VSCCHYN NYOYUFTPN ZHJOBOUPC nPULPCHULPK PVMBUFY? CHPTHAF DBCE CH LPUNYUEULPK PFTBUMY. th HERE ffp chptshy? RETEUBCEOP ABOUT TBCHOPOBYUOSCHE DPMTSOPUFY.

b ULPMSHLP UMHYUBECH UPLTSCHFIS CHPTCHUFCHB VPMSHYNY YUYOPCHOYLBNY. p CHPTCHUFCHE H LPUNYUUEULPK PFTBUMY OBMY u.yCHBOPC Y t.ohtzbmyech. u.yChBOPC UBN PV LFPN TBUULBBM, LPZDB uYUЈFOBS RBMBFB HUFBOPCHYMB ZhBLF CHPTCHUFCHB. NOE RPLBMBMPUSH, UFP PO RPICBUFBMUS FBLIN BOBOYEN. tboshye b UPLTSCHFIE H hZPMPPCHOPN lPDELUE VSCHMB UFBFShS. rTEJIDEOF OBM, UFP YUYOPCHOYLY VHDHF RPLTSCHCHBFSH LPTTHRGYPOETCH, OE CHUI LPOEYUOP, RTEDMPTSYM DHNE HVTBFSH LFH UFBFSHA Y SING U TBDPUFSHA HVTBMY. u.yChBOPCH Y t.ohtzbmyech UFBMY ZETPSNY. pDIO RETECHEDIO RPD LTSCHMP RTEEYDEOFB, DTHZPK CH upChEF VEEPRPBUOPUFY UP MSHZPFBNY NYOYUFTTB. FERETSH RETCHSHCHK THLPCHPDYF LLPMPZYUEULYNY RTPELFBNY. OE TSJOSH, B NBMYOB. y FBLYI RTYNETCH UPFOY EUMY OE FSHCHUSYUY. ZTPNPCH TBCHE OE OBM, UFP EZP NYOYUFT CHPTHEF? OBM Y DPMTSEO VSCHM RPOEUFY OBLBBOYE. y RPOJU, PLBCHYUSH CH UPCHEFE ZHEDETBGYY.

lPMPLPMSHGECH CH UCHPЈN CHYDEOYY LPTTHRGYY PYYVUS ABOUT 100%. CHPF RPFPNKH LPTTHRGYS TBUFЈF Y RTPGCHEFBEF. d.bIBTYUEOLP H nchd PYO FBLPC? WHERE DEMP RTPLHTTPCH nPULPCHULPC PVMBUFY? CHPTCHUFCHP VADCEFOSHCHI UTEDUFCH VSMP RTY UFTPIFEMSHUFCHE pMYNRYBDSC Y PV LFPN PDOBTSDSCH CHSHCHULBMUS RTEYIDEOF OILFP OE UFBM BCCHPDYFSH DEM RP CHPTCHUFCHH RTY UFTPIEFEMSHUFCHE OBVYAELFCH. RPYENH OE RTPCHETSAF, BEUMY RTPCHETSAF FP OE DPLMBDSCHCHBA OBTPDH P FEI YUYOPCHOYLBI, LPFPTSCHEOE RPDBAF DELMBTBGYY. u.yCHBOPC FBL Y ULBBM, LPZDB VSCHM THLPCHPDYFEMEN BDNYOYUFTBGYY RTEIDEOFB. ChPF LFP Y EUFSH YЪVYTBFEMSHOPE FPMLPCHBOYE BLPOCH. rTEJIDEOF, EZP LPOFTPMSHOBS UMHTsVB NPMYUBF. yuYOPCHOYL YUYOPCHOYLH ZMB OE CHSHCHLPMEF. chuЈ ffp y rptptsdbef lpttkhrgya.

rTPYMY CHSCHVPTSCH, NOPZYE PF OBTPDB CHPЪMBZBMY VPMSHYE OBDETSDSCH ABOUT PVOPCHMIOOSHCHK UPUFBCH DKhNSCH. and OBDETSDSCH PRTBCHDSCHCHBAFUS. OH PDOPZP "OYEEZP" CH DKHNKh OE RPRBMP. NYMMYPOETCH Y NYMMYBTDETSCH RTYYMY EBNEOYCH FBLYI CE. BYuEN RTYYMY CH BLPOPDBFEMSHOSHCHK PTZBO VPZBFSHCHE? uFPVShch 5 MEF YURPMSHЪPCHBFSH DMS HDCHPEOYS LBRYFBMB. dTHZPK RPFTEVOPUFY H OII OEF, B ZMBCHOPE OE NPCEF VSHCHFSh. dBCHBKFE RPDHNBEN, LBL Yuempchel Ch FEYEOOYE OEULPMSHLYI MEF ULPMPFIYM NYMMYBTDSCH. sing at OEVB OE RBDBAF. UPVUFCHEOOIL RMBFIM OIEEOULHA BTRMMBFKH TBVPYUYN, ChPNPTsOP HFBYCHBM OBMPZY. b CHUA RTYVSCHMSH LMBM CH LBTNBO. zPUHDBTUFCHH PF LFPZP LBLBS RPMShЪB? DETTSBM CH OYEEFE OEULPMSHLP UPF TBVPYYI Y RMBFIYM OYEEOULYK OBMPZ. rTYVSHCHMSH RETECHPDYM H DPMMBTSHCH Y ЪB VKhZPT. rPFPNKh UEKYUBU CH VADTSEFE OEF DEOEZ. "DEOES OEF, FETRYFE". h UPCHEFULPE CHTENS ABOUT RTYVSHCHMSH UFTPMY VEURMBFOSHCH LCHBTFYTSCH TBVPYUYN, UPDETSBMY DPNB LHMSHFHTSC, UBOBFPTYY, DPNB PFDSCHIB Y DBTSE RPMYLMYOYLY, Y VPMSHOYGSCH. WHERE IS THE FFP? h LBTNBOE UPVUFCHEOOILB. fBL LBLBS RPMShЪB PF LFPZP ZPUHDBTUFCHH? CHPF RPFPNKH YDЈF RTEUFHROBS PRFINYBGYS. h UPUEDOEN RPUЈMLE "nBYU" EUFSH BNVHMBFPTYS, TBURPMPTSOOOBS CH RTELTBUOPN LYTRYUOPN ЪDBOY. MILCHYDYTPCHBMY LTPCHBFY UHFPYUOPZP UPDETSBOYS, PUFBMYUSH OE CHPUFTEVPCHBOSH DOECHOSHCHE. uFBTYL OE NPTSEF HFTPN U LPUFSHCHMЈN RTPKFY 3 - 5 LIMPNEFTCH, RTYOSFSH RTPGEDKHTH Y HKFY PVTBFOP. th FBL OBDP OEULPMSHLP DOEK. 'DPTPCHSHCHK OE CHSHCHDETSYF. MYLCHYDYTPCHBMY MBVPTBFPTYA. UEKYUBU OBVTBMY RPUMEDOEZP CHTBYUB - FETBRECHFB. RETECHEMY CH OILPMSHULHA GEOFTTBMSHOHA VPMSHOYGH. FERETSCH DBTSE OBRTBCHMEOYE ABOUT BOBMYЪSCH OBDP VTBFSH CH OILPMSHULPK RPMYLMOYLE. b LFP 25 LYMPNEFTCH Y PYUETEDY Y CH TEZYUFTBFHTH, Y CH LBVYOEF CHTYUB. chMBUFSH RTPUFP Y'DECHBEFUS OBD OBTPPN, B NSCH MYVP ZPMPUKHEN b LFH CHMBUFSH, MYVP UYDYN DPNB. RPD METSBUYK LBNEOSH DBCE CHPDB OE FEYJF. OP PRFINYBGYS ABOUT LFPN OE BLPOYUMBUSH. h GEOFTBMSHOPK VPMSHOYGE OILPMSHULB BLTSCHMY OELPFPTSCHE PFDEMEOYS, UPLTBFYMY ULPTHA RPNPESH, RETEDBCH EЈ CH reOJH. b LFP 150 LYMPNEFTCH. bBLTSCHCHBAF UFBGIPOBT. at OPCHPZP ZPDB VPMSHOSHCHE VHDHF IPDYFSH MEYUYFSHUS CH ZPTD "ZPTPDYEE" OB 90 LYMPNEFTCH. FP OE CHMBUFSH, BRTEDBFEMY, DTHZYI UMPC OBKFY OECHPЪNPTSOP.

ULPMSHLP TB RTEYDEOF ZPCHPTYM ABOUT UPCHEEBOYSI, UFP UEMSHULHA NEDYGYOH OE OBDP UPLTBEBFSH, OBPVPTPF HER OBDP UPCHETYEOUFCHPCHBFSH. b UFP CH DEKUFCHYFEMSHOPUFY? PRFINYJBHYS RTPPDPMTSBEFUS. UPDBЈFUS FCHETDPE HVETSDEOYE CH FPN, UFP YUYOPCHOYLY DEMBAF CHUЈ OBPVPTPF. nPCEF X OII FBLBS DPZPCHPTJOOPUFSH. UEZPDOS CHUE LFP DPRHEEO L uny ZPCHPTSF P RTEJIDEOFE U VPMSHYPK VHLCHSCH, EZP RPTFTEF CHSHCHEYCHBAF DBTSE X OBYI CHTBZCH. rTY LFPN tPUUYS LBFIFUS CH RTPRBUFSH. CHMBUFSH Y CHUS YUYOPCHOYUSHS UCHPTTB LFP OE PEKHEBEF. sing TSYCHHF RTYRECHBAYUY, B OBTPD OYEBEF. ABOUT UEZPDOS H tPUYY DCHE RTPVMENSCH. lPTTHRGYS Y VEUFPMLCHPE RTBCHYFEMSHUFCHP. RP LFYN RTYYUYOBN ABOUT DOSI THLPCHPDYFEMSH BDNYOYUFTBGYY RTEYDEOFB b.chPKOP RTCHPDYF BUEDBOYE RTEYDYHNB UPCHEFB RP RTPFYCHPDEKUFCHYA LPTTHRGYY. h FFPN UPCHEFE TBCHE OE LPTTHRGIPOETSC BUEDBAF? DMS OBTPDB FFP FINOSHCHK MEU. RP NETSDHOBTPDOPNKH TEKFYOZH tPUUYS OB 119 NEUFE. OYLBLPZP RTPFYCHPDEKUFCHYS OEF. pDOB WPMFP.

vschchyyk ZMBChB lpny fptprch RPD DPNBYOYIN BTEUFPN. хЧЈМ 3 NYMMYBTDB THVMEK. ABOUT DBMSHOEN chPUFPLE CHPEOOSHCH BLHRBAF DTCHB X BOZMYKULPK ZHITNSCH ABOUT 1 NYMMYBTD THVMEK. y ULPMSHLP CE MEF FFPF VBTDBL RTPDPMTSBEFUS? ZPTSF NYMMMYPOSH ZELFBTCH, FBN NPTsOP ЪBZPFBCHMYCHBFSH ZPTEMSHOYL ABOUT DEUSFLY MEF Y VEURMBFOP, PUCHPPVPTSDBS FETTYFPTYA DMS OPCHSHCHI RPUBDPL NPMPDOSLB. rPYENH FBL RPMHYUBEFUS? pF VPMSHYPZP HNB CH RTBCHYFEMSHUFCHE.

mHTSLPC, PFUFTBOJOOSHK PF NTTUFCHB Y LTYFYLPCHBCHYK UFTPIFEMSHUFCHP pMYNRYBDSHCH, RPMKHYUYCHYK OBZTBDKH Y THL RTEYDEOFB, TEELP RPNEOSM UCHPЈ NOOEOYE. "ChSh Yuempchel DMS LPFPTPZP Yueufsh Y UPCHEUFSH SCHMSEFUS ZMBCHOSCHN H UCHPEK DEFEMSHOPUFY. with OE UFBM REOUYPOETPN, CHSHTBEYCHBA ZTEYUYYH DMS UOBVTSEOIS CHPEOOSHCHI". OEKHTSEMY Y PF REOUY PFLBBMUS?

tBCHPTCHBO vBMFYKULYK ZHMPF. UPMDBFSCH, NBFTPUSHCHOE DPEDBAF, YI LBYUBEF PF CHEFTB. PDETSDB CHYDBCHYBS CHYDSCH, RBUFEMSHOPE VEMSHJ U LMEKNPN ZHMPFB RTPDBЈFUS ABOUT VBBTE. fBLPE CE RPMPTSEOIE CH CHPYOULYI YUBUFSI iBVBTPCHULPZP LTBS. uppmdbfshch rtpdbchbmy ptkhtsye, vpertyrbushch yufpvshch rtypvteufy ryfboye. i OILFP OE RPUBTSEO. pV LFPN ABOUT FEMECHIDEOYY TBUULBJSCHCHBEF VPTYU TEKOIL - DERHFBF DHNSCH YEUFPZP UPSCHCHB. tPUUYA CHETOHMY H DECHSOPUFSHCHE ZPDSH, LPZDB UPMDBFSCH ABOUT PUFTPCHE "THUULPN" HNYTBMY PF ZPMPDB.

UEZPDOS FEMECHIDEOYE RTERPDOEUMP OCHSHCHE CHEUFY PF LPFPTSCHI CHPMPU VSHCHUFBM DSHVPN EUMY VSHCH ON VSHCHM. with TBOSHIE RYUBM P FPN, UFP VPMSHIE RTYDKHNBFSH OYUEZP OEMSHЪS DMS RPVPTPCH U OBTPDB RPUME CHCHEDEOYS OBMPZB RP VBBTOPK GEOOE ABOUT OECHYTSYNPUFSH Y TSYMSHЈ. plbshchchbefus RHFY RTBCHYFEMSHUFCHB OEYURPCHEDYNSCH. RTEDMBZBEF OBMPZ ABOUT CHEDOSCHE RTPDHLFSCH. yuyfbfemsh, chshch rpoinbefe yufp rtpyuipdjf h UFTBOE? bB CHEDOSCHE RTPDHLFSCH OBDP UHDYFSH RTPY'CHPDYFEMS Y YUYOPCHOYLB, LPFPTSHCHK TBTEYM LFY RTPDHLFSCH. OBMPZ OE RTPYЈM, B YUYOPCHOYL GEM Y OCHTEDYN. chTEDOSHCH RTPDHLFSCH PVPTPFE. YEEF DTHZYE URPUPVSHCH PVPZBEEOIS. ChMBUFSH PFLBBMBUSH TEZHMYTPCHBFSH GEOSCH ABOUT MELBTUFCHB. eUFEUFCHEOOP OELPFPTSCHE CHMEFSF ABOUT 100%. FP HCE TEEKHMSHFBF RTPYEDYI CHSHCHVPTPCH. th FFP FPMSHLP OBUBMP.

RETEDP NOK ZBEFB "BYzh" No. 40 ЪB FFPF ZPD. GEOSCH CHSHCHTPUMY U OBYUBMB ZPDB OB 17.2%. rP PZHYGYBMSHOSHCHN DBOOSCHN ABOUT 4.1%. DMS LPZP ZBEFB REYUBFBEF TPUF GEO ECENEUSYUOP? uFPVSCH CHMBUFSH PVTBEBMB CHOYNBOYE Y RTYOYNBMB NETSHCH. eUMY DP CHSHCHVPTPCH CHMBUFSH OE PVTBEBMB CHOYNBOYE, FP FERETSHI Y RPDBCHOP. rPYUENKh CHMBUFSH DPMTSOB ЪOBLPNYFSHUS U FEN, UFP REYUBFBEF ZBEFB? x OEI UCHPY YUFPUOYLY YOZHPTNBGYY. h DHNH RTYYMP VPMEE 200 OPCHYULPC. LFP SING? obrtynet b.rbmlyo U RPMHFPTBNY NYMMYBTDPCH THVMEK, 59 LCHBTFYTBNY, FTY YL LPFPTSCHI H rPDNPULPCHSHHE Y VPMEE 200 BCHFPNPVIMEK. ON VKHDEF ЪBOINBFSHUS RTPVMENBNY OBTPDB, UFTBOSHCH? m. pDOBLP YNEEF CH nPULCHE 859 LCHBDTBFOSHCHI NEFTCH TSYMPK RMPEBDY, CH yFBMYY - 176 NEFTCH, CH u.refETVKhZTE - 433 LCHBDTBFOSHCHI NEFTTB. OYEYI YMY PVSCHYUOSCHI U FPYULY ЪTEOYS ЪBTVBVPFLB CH OPCHPK DHNE OEF. NPS ENMSYULB Y fPNULB f.uPMPNBFYOB CH 2015 ZPDKh ЪBTVVPFBMB 26.5 NYMMMYPOCH THVMEK, CH 2014 - 95.4 NYMMMYPOCH. th FBLYI VPMSHYOUFCHP. h UFTBOE FBLPCHB UYUFENB, UFP CH BLPOPDBFEMSHOSH PTZBOSHCH VE DEOEZ RPRBUFSH OECHP'NPTSOP. LBRYFBMYЪN ABOUT LFPN Y UFPYF.

rTPDHLFSCH RPDPTPTSBMY ABOUT 17.2% - FPP Y EUFSH YOZHMSGYS. eUMY UTBCHOYFSH GEOSCH ABOUT MELBTUFCHB, FP LBTFYOB EEI HTSBUOEEE. and WOPCHB FYYOB. OYLPZP LFP OE YOFETEUKHEF, B ZMBCHOPE PRRPYGYA CH DHNE. b BYuEN OBTPDH FBLBS PRRPYGYS Y TBDEFEMY IB OBTPD LPNNHOYUFSHCH FPCE NPMYUBF. CHPF RPFPNKh SING Y RTPMEFEMY.

VEUFPMLCHPUFSH RTBCHYFEMSHUFCHB RPDFCHETDYM FEMECHEDHEIK LBOBMB "gBTSHZTBD" rTPOSHLP. About the RTIP RTYUKHFFFCHBM RTYUKHFFCHBM village Mavpnchdtpch, LPFPTSHK Ulbbm: "Uyufenoschk UKVPFBC Nybmybmybfsh RPTHYUEOS RTEIDEOFB. fBLYE BSCHMEOYS DPMTSOSCH VSHCHFSH TBUUMEDPCHBOSHCH, B UBVPFBTSOILY EUMY FBLPCHSCHE OBKDHFUS DPMTSOSCH RPOEUFY HZPMPCHOPE OBBLBBOYE. chTSD MY X OBU FBLPE CHPNPTsOP. fEMECHYDEOYE OEUJF OPCHPUFSH P FPN, UFP RTEJIDEOF ABOUT UPCHEEBOYY U RTBCHYFEMSHUFCHPN HCE UFHYUYF RP UFPMKh. tsBMSh OBDP UFKHYUBFSH RP MVH UBVPFBTSOILPCH, B MKHYUYE CHSCZPOSFSH RPZBOPK NEFMK, B NPTCEF Y ChPЪVKhTSDBFSH DEMB. fPMSHLP FPZDB YuFP - FP YЪNEOYFUS. bB 16 CHEDSH OILPZP OE HCHPMYMY YOE RPUBDYMY, IPFS UFTBOB CHBMYFUS CH RTPRBUFSH RP LPOPNYUEULYN RTYUYOBN. YuEN FERETSCH VHDHF BOINBFSHUS DERHFBFSCH PF lrtzh? tbche OE RPCHPD TBUULBBFSH OBTPDH P UBVPFBTS NYOYUFTCH, LPFPTSCHE OE CHSHCHRPMOSAF RPTHYUEOYS RTEYDEOFB. NPTSEF DEKUFCHYFEMSHOP X YI FBLPK DPZCHPT.

oBTPD RTCHSHCHL L MYIEOYSN RPFPNKH NPMYUYF. vPMEE FPZP X OEP OEF RPDDETTSLY UP UFPTPOSCH DERHFBFPCH. VSCHMP VSCHOE PVIDOP, EUMY VSCH CHUE TSYMY RP BLBLOBN RP LPFPTSCHN BUFBCHYMY TSYFSH OBTPD. oEEEOULBS ЪBTRMBFB, YЪDECHBFEMSHUFCHP TBVPFPDBFEMEK Y RPDDETSLB YI UP UFPTPOSCH CHMBUFY. lPZDB TBVPYUYE PYASCHMSAF ЪBVBUFPCHLY YMY CHSHCHIPDSF ABOUT NYFYOZY CHMBUFSH TSEUFPLP TBZPOSEF.

rTBCHYFEMSHUFCHP UOPCHB TBDHEF REOUYPOETCHP. pLBSCCHCHBEFUUS U VHDHEEZP ZPDB REOUYY VHDHF YODELUITPCHBFSH FTY ZPDB ABOUT OBNPTPTSEOOSCHK RTPGEOF. vHDEF ON UPPFCHEFUFCHPCHBFSH YOZHMSGYY YMY OEF OBTPDH OE Y'CHEUFOP. OE OBEF PV FFPN Y NYOYUFT ZHYOBOUCH. vPMEE FPZP PZHYGYBMSHOBS YOZHMSHYS OILPZDB bb 16 MEF OE UPPFCHEFUFCHPCHBMB DEKUFCHYFEMSHOPK YOZHMSGYY. UNPFTYFE ZBEFKH "BYZH", LPFPTBS ETSEZPDOP UTBCHOYCHBEF PZHYGYBMSHOHA YOZHMSGYA U TEBMSHOPC.

Here's what's interesting: practically no one argues with the fact that officials steal.
And with the fact that they steal a lot - in general, too. And how can you argue here, if almost everything is in plain sight? Expensive cars and country cottages of “servants of the people” against the backdrop of chronically broken roads, dilapidated and dilapidated housing in a pile of garbage dumps, regular accidents with fatal mass outcomes without punishment of the guilty, dissolute minor acne of the bourgeois elite, including personal friends of the president, and other problems , speak for themselves.

And the billions found in the possession of the governor of the Sakhalin Region, Khoroshavin, scattered throughout the house, right in the boxes - all confirm this. And not only Khoroshavin was caught on the outrageous theft. Yurchenko was suspended, Belykh was detained with a suitcase of cash. Zakharchenko's apartment, littered with banknotes. The Vasilyeva-Serdyukov case, again. Many other cases also confirm that officials are stealing and stealing colossal sums of people's budget money.

Even if we sum up only the cases brought to court with proven facts of theft, we will get tens and hundreds of billions of rubles stolen from the budget. This is the proven part. But there is also something unproven. According to the same Vasilyeva. According to the same Serdyukov. And how many of those who were not brought to trial at all, were not removed from their cases, and who still steal?

It is clear that the list of corrupt officials does not end with Khoroshavin, Vasilyeva and other detainees, but barely begins. And the total amount of theft is much more proven in the courts.

Some are still trying to stand up for the purity of the public procurement system or for the reasonableness of the cost of the Sochi Olympiad, but these are individual guardians. Their zeal can be attributed either to party discipline, or to simple dementia, when a person argues according to the principle “I liked it, then everything is fine.”

But in general, almost everyone agrees that theft is of a large-scale and systematic nature, that it has spread throughout the entire “vertical”. I will say more, their example infected a huge mass of people with kliptomania, primarily officials in power, who, seeing the impunity of this crime, involuntarily also wanted to live beautifully. Because it cannot be that Khoroshavin has been stealing billions for many years, and everyone around was clean. That doesn't happen. Unbeknownst to the rest, you can steal once or twice, you can quietly drain fuel from a state-owned car, squander travel allowances and forge a report. But it is impossible to steal billions for many years unnoticed, for this you need accomplices, many, in different departments, which will also have their accomplices ...

And since most of the theft is carried out within the framework of federal legislation, which is the same for all regions, it is very naive to think that Khoroshavin found ways to steal, while others did not find or did not want to use them. In all regions, officials have found ways to steal. It's just that not everyone has become as insolent as Khoroshavin. And not everyone was decided to be removed, because the vertical will collapse if everyone is removed in a row. And everyone understands this. Or almost everything.

But here's the phenomenon - with all the understanding of the above, half of the country continues to think that Putin is good, that he fights thieves, protects Russia, and so on and so forth. The king is good, the boyars are bad? Sometimes they say so directly - Putin is fighting the liberal environment, corrupt officials, crooks and thieves ...

Sometimes even in reports on corruption (for example, in Moment of Truth), after a frank gesture about large-scale theft is shown on the screen, the presenter makes a phenomenal conclusion like “But Putin is good, because ...” And why is he good? Because he created the ONF and regularly says the right words about the fight against corruption? So it's just words. These words are specifically said so that everyone thinks that Putin is fighting corruption at a time when he simply sits and watches what is happening. Looks after the law to steal.

Putin's speeches are just words for everything good against everything bad. Exactly the same words as about the need to stop the shelling of Donbass and implement the Minsk agreements. Words that do not change anything and do not make it easier for anyone. These words are “halva”, the repetition of which does not make anyone sweeter.

And if you look at it, then in fact this is the phrase “stop the thief”, which the thief himself says, so that no one thinks of him, and everyone catches others.

With words about the fight against corruption, Putin simply diverts suspicion from himself and removes responsibility. Like he knows everything, he is aware, he is against corruption. Yes, he does not really mind - he is part of it.

He is part of United Russia, about the creation of which he himself spoke, recently speaking at the congress. And he even said that he created this party at the beginning of the 2000s, although this is not true. But the main thing is that Putin has publicly recognized himself as part of United Russia.

And for several years he was the chairman of this party, although he was not a member. And most of the governors, heads of departments, Putin appointed from among United Russia. He surrounded himself with United Russia and liberals, crooks and thieves, with whom he allegedly fights. What does this mean?

If the commander-in-chief surrounds himself with an enemy, then he either surrenders, or this is not an enemy for him at all.

But if Putin wanted to give up, he probably wouldn't come back after the castling with Medvedev. And he returned.

So United Russia, liberals, crooks and thieves for Putin are not enemies, not strangers, but their own. And he is for them. It is no coincidence that Putin is so actively supported by all members of United Russia. Agree that crooks and thieves would not support the president who is actually fighting them. They support each other - Putin's United Russia, and Putin - United Russia. Support from the first day and until now, support publicly and essentially.

Putin calls the actions of the government correct, and the decisions of the Central Bank are correct, United Russia obediently votes for the laws that are written in the presidential administration (for example, the law on the National Guard). With Medvedev, Putin generally has complete mutual understanding, friendship and cooperation. Actually, Putin himself promoted it.

There is no Putin's fight against corruption. There is a struggle with individual representatives who have become insolent, stole and began to spoil the furrow. And there is also the sacrificing of individual corrupt officials to the public in order to calm the people, and the rest could safely steal further.

It's like a leader who sometimes kills weak, sick or disobedient wolves from the pack, and the rams rejoice and think that he represents their interests.

No, he simply strengthens his power in the pack, and maintains his authority among the rams, which allows him to keep the grouping of the herd without resorting to forceful methods.

However, it is not entirely correct to compare Putin and United Russia with wolves. Lots of honor. It's not wolves - it's shit.

Our so-called elite, post-Soviet and already even post-Teltsin, who jumped into Western liberal shoes and formed the United Russia party - this is real shit.

And all this shit came out of the same asshole that it turned into (or was turned into, here's how to look) late THE USSR. And since all this shit came out of one asshole and formed an even, decorated heap called United Russia, then where could a cherry appear at the very top of this heap? Where a dung beetle could appear on a pile of shit - I can understand. Where a fly can come from - I can understand. Where can a cherry stone come from - and I can understand it. And where a cherry, a rose or a bee can appear on a pile of shit - I can’t understand. This does not happen - it is unnatural, contrary to the laws of nature.

An attempt to prove that everyone steals and that Putin is good is actually a manifestation of the fear of losing faith in the good tsar. This is the subconscious fear of sheep to look at a leader without a mask and see a wolf. This is the fear of parting with the hope that everything will work out by itself, a kind and wise tsar will defeat the bad and thieving boyars and life will become beautiful. By her own. And for this you do not have to get up from the warm couch.

Those who believe in a good Putin are simply afraid to face the truth, they are afraid of reality, they are afraid to see ahead, instead of Putin's great victory, his miserable and insignificant end, the deplorable outcome of his rule for Russia.

And the whole cunning plan is the same attempt to escape from reality, a passionate desire to believe that everything will work out by itself, and Russia will become great on its own, at the behest of the pike and the king’s will, and for this you don’t need to move, it’s enough to stay on couch, stick in Kiselev's box, believe in the cunning plan of his good leader Putin, listen to Svanidze's tales, and everything will be fine. No, it will not. Nothing will happen by itself.

And Russia will not become great by itself, because 86% are sitting on the couch, believing in a good Putin and his cunning plan, sticking into the minds of Kiselev, Solovyov, Svanidze and others.

Russia will become great, but the path to this will lie, as in the past - through mud and blood, through cleaning the Augean stables into which power has become, through raking the shit that the Russian elite represents together with United Russia, Putin and his entourage, through raking the manure they leave behind. And sitting on the couch is not going to work.

Moreover, the longer you sit and believe in a good Putin and a cunning plan, the stronger your bummer will be when Putin runs away or simply surrenders like Yeltsin, after which it suddenly turns out that there was no cunning plan, no fight against corruption was, there was no protection for Russia, but there was only a lie, a translation of arrows, nonsense for all the good against all the bad, and the consistent sale of Russia to internal enemies, which are much more dangerous than external ones.

But we will not change Putin - this is not in our power and it is not our business at all. Sooner or later it will be replaced without us. Perhaps he will even run away on his own, although I personally do not believe in Putin's ability to make independent decisions. But not the point.

I am not calling on anyone to change Putin. I just want you to let go of your illusions about his "goodness". Just so that you do not fall into a deep and protracted prostration when you see that the king, figuratively speaking, was naked all this time.

Because when THIS happens - it will not be possible to sit and lament about how bad everything is, how we were deceived, how we believed him, and how he really turned out - there will be no time for this. It will be necessary to roll up your sleeves to rake the shit piled up by Putin and United Russia ...

Numerous reports by non-governmental organizations and opposition representatives testify that corruption is the most terrible disease of modern society. Russian society. At first glance, it is not clear why officials in Russia are not afraid to steal in the presence of very strict legislation. However, world experience says that even executions will not save from this. Probably the problem is in the conservatory, as the well-known Soviet joke goes.

Historical traditions of illicit enrichment

Bribery has been a fairly typical phenomenon for centuries:

• Before the beginning of Peter's reforms, the institution of "feeding" actually legalized bribery of civil servants. Power performed its functions only in relation to those people who were ready to generously pay for the necessary services;
• With the founding of the Russian Empire, the situation did not change radically. The bureaucracy, created according to the best Western models, did not have a decent salary, which pushed enterprising officials to look for earnings on the side;
• For a long time, the monarchy safely turned a blind eye to numerous malfeasance. Only in the middle of the 19th century did a series of high-profile cases begin against presumptuous servants of the people;
• The October Revolution did not succeed in radically changing the trend. The bureaucratic apparatus, swollen several times over, demanded more and more money for itself;
• Stalin made an attempt to drown the hydra of corruption in blood, but even in an atmosphere of fear there were people who were ready to do anything for the sake of money;
• In subsequent years, the problem was not solved in any way and was hushed up in every possible way, right up to the dramatic reforms of Gorbachev.

Are officials in Russia afraid to steal?

The volume of stolen by those in power is growing year by year, despite the sharp dissatisfaction of business and ordinary people. It gives the impression that bureaucrats are completely devoid of a sense of fear of the law:

1. High-profile anti-corruption cases broadcast on all federal TV channels rarely end in real terms. For example, the theft at Oboronservis did not affect the well-being of the defendants in any way. The former and his accomplice managed to get away with it in front of millions of people;
2. There is a non-zero probability that representatives of the very top of the national economy are subject to corruption. political system. According to the reports of the murdered oppositionist Boris Nemtsov, Vladimir Putin has a fortune of several tens of billions of dollars. Such a president has no motive to fight bribery;
3. Does not help to cope with theft and folk mentality. According to sociological surveys, a significant part of the population treats bribe-takers condescendingly. The share of people who gave bribes at least once is more than 50%.

Pain points of domestic corruption

In the case of misappropriation of people's goods, the following succeeded to the greatest extent:

• Law enforcement services. The slogan of one of the modern Russian TV series “Law and Order. Expensive" does not look quite fantastic. Quite common is the practice of stopping the prosecution of criminals for a certain bribe;
• Ordinary bureaucrats turn paperwork and certificates into a profitable business. Every entrepreneur who tried to go through the need to obtain all the necessary permits was convinced of this;
• Another of the most corrupt environments is education. A number of higher educational institutions provide an opportunity for the children of wealthy parents not to go to school in principle;
• There are legends about dishonest taxmen. A large pocket can provide indulgence for obvious offenses;
• Customs officers also do not live in poverty. The passage of goods across the border depends on these people, who suffer heavily from the watchman's syndrome. Anything that these servants of the Unclean One likes becomes confiscated and is instantly seized.

Sluggish attempts to fight eternal evil

Mikhail Zadornov once dropped that the fight against corruption in Russia is being carried out by very experienced corrupt officials. This is probably why all the attempts of the authorities to overcome the eternal domestic misfortune did not end in any result.

Although the picture on TV depicts a brutal fight against bureaucratic theft:

• In 2011-2012 the famous "gambling business" thundered throughout the country. Recently, casinos and similar establishments have been banned in our Palestinians. What did not prevent them to exist safely, thanks to the cover of the regional authorities;
• In 2012, it became known about large thefts in aerospace structures responsible for the creation of a domestic satellite system. Vasya Oblomov's song "About GLONASS" talks about it better than any newspaper;
• It is a widely known fact that stolen dirty money is safely laundered abroad thanks to conveniently placed holes in the legislation. In 2013, Vladimir Putin attempted to de-offshorize by creating Federal Financial Monitoring Service. The success of this initiative is highly predictable;
• In 2014-2015, a national anti-corruption plan was approved. Within its framework, exemplary arrests of individual regional officials were carried out.

When will Russia stop stealing?

The experience of the extremely successful reforms in Georgia, carried out by Kakha Bendukidze, gave hope to the inhabitants of the entire post-Soviet space for a life without bribes.

Experts give an approximate recipe for a happy future:

1. Cardinally change the staff of the bureaucracy. With courage, you can say that they are stealing almost all. Instead of re-educating the old, it is much more efficient to hire younger and more ambitious ones;
2. In parallel with the reforms, it is necessary to carry out propaganda among ordinary citizens. Russians (especially wealthy ones) are used to solving any problem with the ruble, so at first they can experience culture shock from living by the law;
3. Anti-bribery measures do not have to be harsh. The experience of China shows that the execution article is not a panacea. It is enough to achieve equality before the law for all citizens.

The chronological framework for the disappearance of corruption is rather murky. The only thing that can be said for sure is: “Neither me nor you will have to live at this beautiful time.” As long as the current party in power remains at the helm, there is no hope for change.

The great Russian writer Saltykov-Shchedrin very accurately described the future of his homeland a hundred years later: "they drink vodka and steal." Neither Stalin's repressions, nor Gorbachev's reforms, nor Putin's futile initiatives changed the situation. Perhaps, in the distant year 2118, the inhabitants of our country will continue to wonder why officials in Russia are not afraid to steal. But like centuries ago, he will purely rhetorical .

Video: a large bribe of an official for 9 billion

This video will show searches in the house of the head of the anti-corruption department "T" of Russia, who found almost 9 billion rubles in cash in his apartment: