Nicholas Kapinus. Nikolay Kapinus: SROs don't make nightmares, they are forced to work according to the law. Start of hostilities
Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Alexander Buksman, known for his public speeches on the topic of corruption, seems to be using his official position to save the family budget. Journalists learned that Buksman, together with his new wife, the rector of the Academy of the General Prosecutor's Office, is "nightmare" by the Moscow management company, considering the tariffs set by it to be too high, while living in an elite apartment worth over 60 million rubles.
The story, the heroes of which were the deputy Yuri Chaika Alexander Buksman and his wife Oksana Kapinus, heading the Academy of the General Prosecutor's Office, began in the residential complex "Italian Quarter", located two kilometers from the Kremlin. Simple Moscow pensioner Nelly Taraskina For six months, he has been writing complaints to all instances against the Management Company "Service Group" because of allegedly inflated utility bills. Apparently, the pensioner is not embarrassed that she lives in a club house, in an apartment 176 sq. meters and cost almost 63 million rubles. It is possible that it does not bother, because the apartment went to citizen Taraskina from her granddaughter - Oksana Kapinus. And apparently, it was the granddaughter who advised the elderly woman to fill up the management company with complaints, promising her support in the form of heavy artillery - Deputy Prosecutor General Alexander Buksman.
Prosecutorial couple in the struggle for economy
Journalists from the Kompromat Group learned about the connections between Nelly Taraskina, Oksana Kapinus and Alexander Buksman. According to them, in October last year, the deputy prosecutor general and the honorary worker of the prosecutor's office were legally married, having celebrated a modest wedding. From that moment, Buksman went on the path of communal war, because, having moved to the "Italian Quarter", he decided that his modest salary was hardly enough for rent in the amount of 30 thousand rubles and we must lower tariffs at any cost.
Non-poor pensioner
Officially, neither Buksman nor Kapinus have anything to do with the old woman Taraskina's apartment - an elderly woman is listed as the sole owner of a huge living space, and until recently she owned another apartment in the same elite building of almost identical cost. In addition, the tenant owned four parking spaces in the underground garage - the total value of the property recorded for the pensioner exceeded 135 million rubles. It turned out that Nelly Taraskina began to get rich after her granddaughter began to climb the career ladder, using not only professional qualities, but also successful marriages.
“Ivchenko Oksana Sergeevna once changed her maiden name to the surname of her ex-husband Nikolai Kapinus, also a native of the prosecutor's environment, the ex-head of the central department of Rostechnazdor. It is noteworthy that shortly after Kapinus left Rostekhnadzor in 2014, his post with the prefix "acting" was taken by a man also named Ivchenko - Vladimir, who was called in the press "a very close relative" of Oksana Kapinus. Vladimir Ivchenko ended his short career in Rostekhnadzor in the dock: he was accused of bribery from controlled organizations in the Central Federal District.”, - writes Kompromat Group.
To whom I owe - I forgive
It is not known who and how he thanked for his appointment to the post. Vladimir Ivchenko, however, he never got to court - the case was closed after the statute of limitations expired, since the Prosecutor General's Office skillfully dragged out the investigation process. In 2017, the Kapinus divorced, after which the rector of the AGP was left with an apartment in the "Italian Quarter" - the second became the property of Nikolai Kapinus. Together with the apartment, Oksana Kapinus also had obligations to pay debts, but these obligations in no way pressed on the shoulder straps of the prosecutor, because of which she accumulated unpaid receipts for 373 thousand rubles.
“When the debt for the rendered utilities reached 373 thousand rubles, the management company Service Group reasonably applied for the recovery of this debt to the court. And in August last year, the Tverskoy Court of Moscow, of course, recognized the correctness of the Criminal Code, obliging the nominal owner - citizen Taraskina - to pay off the debt in full. Oksana Kapinus had no choice but to pay the accumulated debt, but, interestingly, it was not she who did it personally, and not even her grandmother, but a certain officer of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Central Administrative District of Moscow Gilev Alexander Vladimirovich ", the publication reports.
This Gilev did not just go to pay other people's bills - representatives of the Management Company "Service Group" report that the police of the Central Administrative District tried to run into their company in various ways, but did not find any clues. Apparently, in a higher department they considered that since the police could not eliminate the objectionable company, they should eliminate the accumulated debt.
Sue not to pay
With the repayment of the debt, the war did not stop, because you need to pay something monthly. Therefore, Mrs. Taraskina sent letters of demand check the legality of tariffs established by the Criminal Code, in Tver Prosecutor's Office of Moscow, Moszhilinspektsiya and law enforcement agencies. Taraskina's letters were written by an obviously experienced lawyer - perhaps at the level of the rector of the GP academy or even higher.
After the letters written and sent out by the prosecutor's hand, a series of checks fell upon the Criminal Code on a wide variety of issues, just to find something. Nothing was found, so it is possible that anyone will pay for the apartment of Buksman and Kapinus, but not the prosecutors.
“But, apparently, it is too early for employees of the management company to relax. They, as we already understand, are opposed by truly heavy artillery. It is not clear how this communal story is combined with the honor of the prosecutor's uniforms, which are worn by both Oksana Kapinus and her new betrothed Alexander Buksman., - sums up Kompromat Group.
05.08.2015
The attitude towards the system of self-regulation in construction is very different - from complete approval to complete rejection with forecasts of imminent liquidation.
But the recently adopted amendments to the Urban Planning Code allow this system to correct the shortcomings on its own and start working at a new level. About how the National Association of Builders (NOSTROY) checks SROs that committed violations and whether these SROs have a chance to survive, we talk with the heads of the NOSTROY apparatus Nicholas Kapinus:
Nikolai Ivanovich, recently both the Ministry of Construction and NOSTROY have been making decisions that directly or indirectly affect the lives of builders. First of all, I mean the amendments to the Urban Planning Code, which gave the National Associations the right to check SROs and recommend that they be excluded from the state register - and this can create problems for construction companies - members of these SROs. I would like to understand everything in more detail.
I would like to note that when the draft law was discussed, a lot was done to ensure that these changes had the least possible impact on conscientious builders. On the first experience of exclusion from the state register of SRO "Regionstroyservis" we tried to think everything over very carefully. Yes, this SRO had a whole range of violations that are only provided for in the law and, it would seem, what is there to regret? But we always remembered that SROs may include construction companies that are on the sites right now. Therefore, we not only published a relevant notice on the website and sent it to the coordinators for further distribution, but also published a special message in one of the federal newspapers urging everyone who has permission from this SRO to contact the NOSTROY Apparatus. But there were no such offended organizations.
I emphasize once again: this law is important for a self-regulating community, we were waiting for it and helped to be born, so every roughness does not please us, and we are trying to eliminate it. Let me remind you that the law was born as a result of a symbiosis of opinions of the Ministry of Construction, Rostekhnadzor, the profile committee of the State Duma, the Federation Council and National Associations. It seems to me a surprisingly successful novella of the law that no one - neither the National Associations nor Rostekhnadzor - can independently decide on the exclusion of SROs from the register. NOSTROY does not make decisions on exclusion from the state register, but can only recommend exclusion of SROs. And Rostekhnadzor has no right to exclude SROs without our opinion. At the same time, the supervisory authority has the opportunity, as before, to go to court - the previous procedure remains. But as practice has shown, this path is very long and practically unpromising.
I must say that Rostekhnadzor is very careful about the procedure for exclusion of SROs, because it understands that in the event of an unlawful exclusion of an SRO from the register, it will have to be held in court. When NOSTROY sends a conclusion on the possibility of exclusion of the SRO from the register, Rostekhnadzor appoints its own inspection and only then makes a decision. NOSTROY works according to the same scheme. For example, at the end of June, we received a letter from Rostekhnadzor with a request to issue an opinion on exclusion from the register of the Moscow SRO ROST. We will check each argument stated in the letter of Rostekhnadzor, prepare materials for the NOSTROY Council, and express our opinion.
- And how does NOSTROY itself make a decision to conduct an audit of the SRO for exclusion from the state register?
The procedure is described in our internal document, which determines the order of its passage. There are similar documents in Rostekhnadzor and the Ministry of Construction of Russia, which also describe the entire procedure that does not allow someone alone to make a decision on their own.
Based on the NOSTROY Procedure, there are clear grounds on the basis of which an SRO check is carried out - these are complaints and appeals, if they are not anonymous and contain real arguments. Suppose a complaint is received that some SRO does not have 100 members. We turn to the database of the tax inspectorate, analyze whether these organizations exist - at this stage, nothing is requested from the SRO, the entire preliminary check is carried out by the NOSTROY Apparatus. If violations take place, the issue is submitted to the Council NOSTROY. And already the Council makes a decision: to start the verification procedure to give an opinion on the exclusion of the SRO from the register or not to start.
It was on these grounds that we started checking 13 SROs, which Alexey Belousov, NOSTROY coordinator for St. Petersburg, asked to check. But 13 organizations is a lot, the Staff can process information on 4-5 SROs at the same time. In addition, in the same period, more complaints were received from the construction organization to the SRO and from the consumer to the SRO - as a result, there were about 20 complaints. With them and with all NOSTROY now and works.
Upon receipt of a complaint, the director of the SRO is immediately sent an appeal with a request to explain the claims. Thus, the director of the complaint will know immediately, no one else. And it is right. At this stage, it is impossible to allow a wide notification - what if the information in the complaint turns out to be slander? By the way, we had cases when, after the Council made a decision to start the procedure for considering the exclusion of SROs from the register, some comrades immediately took a copy of the decision, went to construction organizations and said: “Do you see how bad everything is in your SRO? Come to me!"
I emphasize that the NOSTROY Apparatus must conduct an audit of the SRO from the moment the NOSTROY Council gave us a corresponding instruction, and report at the next meeting of the Council. Typically, this is a month. Employees of the Administration request certificates, information, documents within the framework provided to us by law. These frameworks are quite narrow - we can send a mandatory request to the SRO, but it only concerns the provisions specified in Art. 55.2. Town-planning code.
But will this mechanism be used to settle scores and stifle competitors? It is well known that, for example, regional self-regulatory organizations cannot stand inter-regional ones and really want to remove them. And who can prevent them from organizing statements in order to arrange a check? Indeed, if you wish, you can find violations at any SRO.
Yes it is possible. But we discussed this at the stage of writing the law and eventually came to the conclusion that the whole procedure is described in such detail that it will not allow us to strangle competitors. Let's say someone wrote a complaint against an SRO competitor that looks plausible. But in the future, even if the Council authorized the inspection and we found these violations, representatives of this SRO are invited to the meeting of the Council, who have the right to explain the violations and undertake to eliminate them.
That is, the identification of certain violations and the Council's decision to start an audit does not mean a "death" sentence for the SRO?
Of course not. I have repeatedly said that we do not have a goal to reduce the number of SROs. I am deeply convinced that even if violations of the law have been committed, the SRO should be given the opportunity to correct them. At the last meeting of the Council, I, addressing the members of the Council, said: you are now deciding the fate of not a specific director of the SRO that you did not like, and not even the fate of the SRO - you are discussing the fate of the builders who are members of the SRO, you need to think about them first of all .
- Is it possible to correct some violations in the verification process? Or is everything already drawn?
Of course you can. This is not a sentence! The SRO has at least 2-3 months to eliminate them. And even if during this time the violations are not eliminated, the SRO may ask the Council to give it additional time. Although it is not used much now, but I am sure that such a term will be given. If the violations are still not corrected, the NOSTROY Council decides to approve the conclusion on the possibility of excluding the SRO from the state register. We send this conclusion to Rostekhnadzor, which has a month to conduct its inspection and make a final decision. And, if by the time the SRO decides to eliminate the violations, Rostekhnadzor will not exclude it from the register. That is, our conclusion is not enough - we still need an established fact of violation of the law.
I quite often hear from the leaders of the SRO that NOSTROY in this whole procedure acts not as an assistant to the SRO, on whose funds it is supported, but as a punitive body, which has one task - to punish. And I would like to be identified and helped to eliminate ...
But the very fact that we found violations, drew the attention of the SRO to the need to correct them, is already help. And we cannot eliminate violations for some kind of SRO. This is their job.
- To be excluded from the register, all the violations specified in the law must be present, or is one enough?
The law is formulated in such a way that one violation is enough, but in practice everything is far from being the case. More recently, Rostekhnadzor did not make a decision to exclude one of the Ural SROs from the register, although there was a corresponding conclusion from NOSTROY: the SRO has a hole in the comp fund of 42 million rubles, the leaders allegedly borrowed and did not repay. There are relevant letters from the prosecutor's office, the FSB, the local Rostekhnadzor, but the central Rostekhnadzor did not make a decision to expel him. Therefore, it is impossible to say that SROs are “nightmares”.
According to various estimates, from 40 to 100 SROs commit serious violations in their work. The rest of the SROs are conscientious, and does this mean that NOSTROY will never come to them with an inspection? Or do you want to see how things are in all SROs?
We do not have such a goal. But the administrative department of the NOSTROY Apparatus monitors the websites of the SRO on a daily basis. This is a very good preventive measure to avoid or detect violations in time. As soon as something is revealed, a letter is sent to the SRO indicating violations and a request to correct it. But this is a different procedure.
And by the way, there is no need to dramatize the situation with those SROs that have less than 100 members - they just have to merge with a larger and stronger SRO, and without re-contributing contributions to the compfund. And there is already a mechanism for this. It is necessary to apply to NOSTROY with a statement that the SRO does not have the required number of members, and ask, on this basis, to exclude the SRO from the register. In this case, the SRO Compfund is transferred to NOSTROY, but SRO members have the right to individually join other SROs, and NOSTROY will transfer their contribution to the Compfund to the new SRO. And no re-payments!
- What are the main tasks of NOSTROY for the near future?
The next very important step is the launch of the register of SRO member companies. And although Rostekhnadzor approved the registry form for us only in early April, we started working on it already in December last year. But when they wanted to speed up the work a little and proactively requested information for the registry from the SRO, what started here! Complaints were written against us to the Ministry of Construction, from there a strict order was received to stop the requests - that is, everything was done so that the activity on the registry did not budge at all.
- Why? Anyone interested in an opaque registry?
In my opinion, yes. We have SROs, which have no real members at all - they are created solely for the sale of permits. And the owners of such SROs do not need a transparent registry, they need a multi-million dollar business. It seems to me that they are trying to protect him in every possible way.
And yet, we managed to do a lot on the register. As a result of the competition, out of 10 companies, a contractor was selected that suits us both in terms of price and quality of work. The registry form is approved by Rostekhnadzor, and it is with those fields that correspond to the requirements of the law.
I really hope that the registry will turn out to be good, and there are prerequisites for that. Now, in pilot mode, 12 SROs have voluntarily uploaded information to the register. What is most interesting, only one SRO was able to meet its requirements. The rest have not been able to fill in a number of fields correctly. And these are very good, conscientious SROs.
- That is, "businessmen" have found another product on which you can earn?
That's it. And, by the way, the registry, among other things, is an opportunity to get away from paper workflow. Now, as soon as the SRO makes any decision on its page in the registry, we immediately receive it and send it to Rostekhnadzor with our signature. Everything is very fast and transparent.
The second very interesting step is that at the Congress we decided that NOSTROY has the right to approve a single form of a certificate of admission to types of work. What will it give? In my opinion, the form should be electronic. When a member of the SRO receives a certificate of admission, it automatically appears in the register and becomes available to everyone. After all, now, if a company has suspended or canceled a certificate of admission, no one knows about it. She can continue to work with this certificate without even joining another SRO. With the introduction of the registry and a single form of a certificate of admission, this situation will completely become a thing of the past, because all changes will be immediately reflected in the registry, and anyone who is interested will find this information. The cost of printing secure forms will be reduced - if necessary, the certificate can simply be printed on a printer or not printed at all.
Here is a short summary of our main tasks at the "modern stage", and if they are implemented, the self-regulation system will enter a new stage.
Everyone remembers what a culture shock in the self-regulatory community was caused by the news about, who, upon joining the National Association of Builders with the "approved" members of the Council, appointed himself Nikolai Kutyin. Indeed, after the Basin leadership on a voluntary basis, the two millionth salary looked somehow too much for the first month of work. All the more clean hands minus all taxes! The new Nostroite leadership, presumably, read the reviews on the forums and was genuinely perplexed about the reaction of the plebeians - what is wrong with the fact that people who are used to living in a big way intend to continue this process further? Don't the directors of the SRO - the people themselves are far from poor - want the top of NOSTROY to lie down for them with their breasts on the embrasure of the Ministry of Construction for thanks?
The well-intentioned part of the community agreed - yes, let them get as much as they want, as long as they do their job! If a person puts things in order in the industry, saves billions for the state, then he doesn’t feel sorry for a couple of “lemons” a month. It turned out, however, that those who spoke in this way did not take into account one simple thing - yesterday's RTNovtsy were by no means poor even before their arrival on Malaya Gruzinskaya.
For example, the right hand of Mr. Kutyin, the current head of the NOSTROY Apparatus and his namesake Nikolai Kapinus published a couple of years ago these data about his condition on the RTN website. It turns out that in a year, the head of the Central Directorate of Rostekhnadzor earned as much as 110.94 million rubles! Of course, it’s not good to count money in other people’s pockets, but when it comes to an official, especially one working in the control and supervision department, the public has the right to ask the question - where did such profits come from, good sir? After all, it may well turn out that it was the official himself who tricked the pockets - his own and subordinate builders - and beguiled.
The website gives the same figure about the income of Nikolai Ivanovich Party Apple. It is doubtful that an RTN official, even a high-ranking one, would receive 9-10 million a month. Does Mr. Kapinus really play poker so well, or did he find a treasure in the Scythian mounds? ... Especially since a year earlier, in 2011, the website of Rostekhnadzor called a much more moderate figure of 1.1 million rubles. Surely both the vigilant Yabloko and the native office made a hundred times mistake when they checked the declaration?
But even if we leave the suspicious confusion with incomes, it still turns out that Mr. Kapinus and his household are an economic and very prosperous person. He owns (as of 2012) two apartments - one with an area of 91.97 square meters - in Moscow, the second, with 144 square meters - in Greece.
His wife, the rector of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation and just a beauty Oksana Kapinus owns a couple more apartments in the capital - one with an area of 31.1, the other 129.9 square meters. A minor daughter will also not be a dowry - a house in the Krasnodar Territory with an area of \u200b\u200b314.2 squares and a land plot have already been registered to her. The family's fleet is modest, but worthy - one Land Rover and one Mercedes-Benz.
In a word, the modest "Rostechnostroy" Nikolai Ivanovich Kapinus is either an extremely tight-fisted person in everyday life, since he was able to acquire such property for one official salary, or he is prudently silent about something. The latest in NOSTROY and corruption scandals that Rostekhnadzor gives great food for thought - about what exactly.
Moreover, serious questions arose for the Kapinus spouses along the line of the Prosecutor General's Office. So, as recently as February 2013 "New Newspaper" mentioned an ugly story. It was assumed that a certain businessman would approach Mrs. Kapinus and for a bribe of 300 thousand dollars will ask through the spouse to solve the problems with the garbage dump. However, the operational experiment in relation to the Kapinus spouses had to be canceled: a hype began after the suicide in the building of the Prosecutor General's Office of the head of the department for supervision of the execution of laws on federal security Vyacheslav Sizov.
So, who knows, maybe it was not by chance that the head of the NOSTROY Apparatus suddenly developed a love for ancient dramas and red-figure vase painting. The news from foggy Albion comes unkind - there, fugitive Russian officials and oligarchs are now disliked and even sometimes demanded to explain exactly where the money they brought with them was honestly earned. And in Greece, the people are not rich, a wealthy Russian will be happy. Naturalized, for example, from Nicholas Kapinus in Nicholas Kapinopoulos- and live for yourself, but rejoice. Wander through the ruins of the Parthenon, drink Mediterranean wines and dance sirtaki.
We continue to follow the corruption scandal at the National Association of Builders.
Your ZanoStroy.RF
First Deputy Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Alexander Buksman and his young wife Oksana Kapinus, rector of the State Enterprise Academy, do not want to pay rent for elite housing
In the center of Moscow, in the prestigious Italian Quarter residential complex, a communal scandal erupted, involving high-ranking officials of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation. The owner of one of the apartments, a certain pensioner Taraskina, is scribbling complaints against the management company of the residential complex "Service Group", not wanting to pay bills for the maintenance of elite housing. In parallel, the office of this company is shaken by countless inspections of supervisory authorities and even searches. And this is not surprising, because the real owner of the apartment is the rector of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation Oksana Kapinus, who has recently been married to the first deputy prosecutor general Alexander Buksman.
The subject of a communal squabble was the payment for the maintenance of an immodest apartment with an area of 176.6 square meters. m. and worth 62.8 million rubles, located in a prestigious "club" house on the street. Fadeeva, 4a. The house is located just two kilometers from the Kremlin; it is inhabited by pop stars, politicians, successful businessmen and other representatives of non-poor, frankly speaking, segments of the population, as well as prosecutor Oksana Kapinus - just in the aforementioned apartment No. 124. Another tenant of this apartment, according to neighbors, not so long ago was Alexander Buksman, the first deputy prosecutor general of Russia.
However, none of them has a formal relation to elite housing. The owner of the apartment, according to the state register of real estate, is a simple Russian pensioner Taraskina Nelli Vasilievna, 81 years old. Moreover, until 2017, she was also listed as the owner of another apartment No. 50 in the same house with an area of 145.6 sq. m and worth 62.2 million rubles, as well as four parking spaces in the underground garage, the market price of which is more than 10 million. In total, it turns out that the grandmother owned a cool metropolitan real estate worth over 135 million rubles!
In general, the situation is not the most exceptional for Moscow: everyone knows that, starting from the 90s, the standard of living of the capital's grandmothers has been steadily growing. Not all, of course, but mainly those whose children and grandchildren were involved in public office. And Madame Taraskina is a representative of just this happy clip: Oksana Kapinus is her own granddaughter.
In official sources, Oksana Sergeevna Kapinus is presented as Doctor of Law, Professor, Rector of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, State Counselor of Justice 2nd class and an honorary worker of the Prosecutor's Office.
But Oksana Kapinus has one more, not so public, incarnation: she is the wife of Alexander Buksman, man No. 2 in the prosecutor's hierarchy.
Rumors about a close relationship between Kapinus and Buksman have been circulating on the sidelines of the department for a long time. Over the past year and a half, they were constantly seen together at various official and semi-social events, as well as on various trips. The marriage of two high-ranking prosecutors took place in October last year, in the strictest secrecy. But, as you know, an office romance is such an awl that you cannot hide in any office "bag", even if we are talking about the offices of the Prosecutor General's Office. And the impartial search engine "Yandex" when requesting "Kapinus Buksman" in the first line gives an auto-hint: "Kapinus Buksman wedding". This means that the formal owner of the apartments in the "Italian Quarter" can already be considered the common grandmother of the prosecutors.
In general, we must pay tribute to the ability of Oksana Kapinus to find the right men at the right time. The rector of the Academy is only 39 years old, and, according to many colleagues, she made her rapid career not least thanks to this quality and bright appearance.
Ivchenko Oksana Sergeevna once changed her maiden name to the surname of her ex-husband Nikolai Kapinus - also a native of the prosecutor's environment, ex-head of the central department of the Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision (Rostekhnazdor), currently head of the Academy of the National Association of Builders (NOSTROY ). It is noteworthy that shortly after Kapinus left Rostekhnadzor in 2014, his post with the prefix "acting" was taken by a man also named Ivchenko - Vladimir, who was called in the press "a very close relative" of Oksana Kapinus. Vladimir Ivchenko ended his short career in Rostekhnadzor in the dock: he was accused of bribes put on stream from controlled organizations in the Central Federal District. However, "connections with the Prosecutor General's Office," as the journalists who watched the process noted, allowed Ivchenko to avoid a real sentence. In May 2017, he was released from the pre-trial detention center after the expiration of the investigation period, which was obviously artificially dragged out by someone “upstairs”.
Nikolai Kapinus
This story did not affect the career of Oksana Kapinus in any way - she still heads the Academy - but her personal life, apparently, changed dramatically: last year the Kapinus spouses divorced. However, Nikolai Kapinus is 22 years older than Oksana, so it was initially naive to consider their union as a love marriage. But, one way or another, this marriage fell apart.
Moreover, if at first there were rumors about a divorce, then later these rumors had quite weighty confirmation: in 2017, apartment No. 50 in the house on the street. Fadeeva 4a was re-registered as the property of a citizen Kapinus N.I. That is, the former spouses quietly and civilly divided the property, and only one of the two elite apartments remained in the ownership of Oksana Kapinus (more precisely, her grandmother).
Let's get back to communal history.
Having bought two elite apartments in 2014, prosecutor Kapinus apparently decided that she was exempt from all further expenses for life. And she simply did not pay monthly utility bills; and I must say, these bills, taking into account the footage of these apartments, were rather big: on average, 23 thousand rubles a month for apartment number 50 plus 30 thousand rubles. - for apartment number 124.
When the debt for the rendered utilities reached 373 thousand rubles, the management company Service Group reasonably applied for the recovery of this debt to the court. And in August last year, the Tverskoy Court of Moscow, of course, recognized the correctness of the Criminal Code, obliging the nominal owner - citizen Taraskina - to pay off the debt in full.
Oksana Kapinus had no choice but to pay the accumulated debt, but, interestingly, it was not she who did it personally, and not even her grandmother, but a certain officer of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Central Administrative District of Moscow Alexander Vladimirovich Gilev. As an individual, that is, from personal funds, which is confirmed by the Sberbank receipt provided to the management company.
One can easily imagine the pressure exerted on the policemen of the Central Administrative District through the prosecutor's line. Fulfilling the categorical instructions of the newlywed Buksman, the capital's prosecutors, in turn, pressed the district security officials closest to the conflict: "run into" the management company under any pretext! When there were no pretexts left, and even the court sided with the public utilities, Gilev, deputy head of the Internal Affairs Directorate, had no choice but to personally pay off the debts of the prosecutor's couple. In order not to aggravate the situation, not to prolong the squabble, and finally return to their direct duties: maintaining law and order in the entrusted territory.
However, the prosecutor's couple Kapinus and Buksman could not just leave it like that, and now, signed by the 81-year-old owner of the housing, a letter is sent to the Tver Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office of Moscow demanding to check the legality of the formation of tariffs for the services of UK Service Group LLC. Needless to say, this letter was drawn up according to the highest standards of legal casuistry - not otherwise, they wrote an examination at the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation! In parallel, this appeal is sent to the Moscow Housing Inspection and law enforcement agencies for verification within their competence. That is, the approach is truly professional.
As a result, since September 2017, the management company has already passed several checks on the approval of tariffs, methods of managing the facility, holding general meetings of residents, etc. Employees of the Criminal Code were interrogated, documents were confiscated, the whole process took place under the vigilant control of the Tver Interdistrict Prosecutor's Office, high officials went to the facility one after another. "Italian Quarter", in particular, personally visited the deputy. Tver inter-district prosecutor Kobzarev P.F., assistant to the Tver inter-district prosecutor Sharshovykh I.A., deputy. heads of the district council and two representatives of the Moscow Housing Inspection! If only every appeal of every Moscow pensioner received so much attention! ..
However, all in vain. The Tver inter-district prosecutor's office was forced to state and report to the Prosecutor General's Office that no violations were found, the tariffs were formed and applied legally.
Nevertheless, in the Prosecutor General's Office, the appeal of citizen Taraskina, as you might guess, is under special control, and the order to find at least some kind of "hook", apparently, was given at the very top. Or, to be more precise, from the office of Alexander Buksman.
One clue was found. In December 2017, the OMVD of Russia for the Tverskoy District of Moscow (of course, at the urgent request of the Prosecutor General's Office) initiated a criminal case No. 327 part 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - the use of a knowingly false document. It turned out that on behalf of a certain citizen G. I. Pistsov, one of the residents of the “Italian Quarter”, a letter was provided to the general meeting of the owners of the premises in 2015, signed not personally by Pistsov. However, later it turned out that his wife signed the letter for Pistsov, besides, the vote of one owner at that time was only 0.39% of the total number of votes, and therefore could not significantly affect the decision of the meeting, and, finally, this marital "forgery ”was committed already in 2015, which means that a case under this article cannot be initiated due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
But, apparently, it is too early for the employees of the management company to relax. They, as we already understand, are opposed by truly heavy artillery. It is only unclear how this communal history is combined with the honor of the prosecutor's uniforms, which are worn by both Oksana Kappius and her new betrothed Alexander Buksman.
But it is clear why the fight against corruption in Russia, to put it mildly, is stalling. Because the top officials of the Prosecutor General's Office have other, much more important, concerns: they need to reduce payments for the maintenance of their elite real estate at any cost.
Monday, April 16, 2018
- As a result of a chain of transactions from municipal property, more than eight thousand square meters of land were alienated in favor of Damir Muginov's structures. In 2014, the right to lease was transferred to Tan, which subsequently, together with the company Financial Investments, also associated with Muginov, took advantage of the preemptive right to buy at the auction and purchased about one hectare of land from the mayor's office, paying only about 15 million rubles. In January 2016, the company sold the plot marked "for the construction of multi-apartment residential buildings" to Muginov for 15 million rubles, and the next month he resold it for 140 million to the company of entrepreneur Rabis Salikhov "City", which is building the Quiet Grove residential complex on it. 2".
The head of the OFAS, who initiated proceedings on these violations, was recalled:
- During the period that the Bashkir OFAS was headed by Ruzalin Khabibullin, the department initiated a number of unprecedented antimonopoly proceedings, including those involving major Ufa officials and businessmen. So, in June last year, officials of the Department of Land and Property Relations of the Ufa City Hall and an influential businessman Damir Muginov were recognized as participants in the agreed actions. The actions of officials allowed Mr. Muginov to receive at the auction for about 15 million rubles. in the ownership of a plot for the construction of a tennis court on Zorge Street, which was later sold for the construction of a residential complex to the Zhilstroyinvest company for 140 million rubles. In November, the Bashkir OFAS recognized as participants in the coordinated actions the Ministry of Land and Property Relations of the Republic, its subordinate State Unitary Enterprise Management of Administrative Buildings of the Republic of Bashkortostan, its subsidiary Construction Investments, and the SU-10 group of entrepreneur Valery Mansurov. According to the OFAS, the actions of the defendants led to the alienation, bypassing the bidding procedure, of state property worth more than 100 million rubles.
Please check the facts. I also ask you to check the purchases of the Financial Department of the Administration of the Urban District of the city of Ufa, for possible affiliation of bidders:
I ask you to report the results of the inspection within the time period established by law.”
According to the rumors circulating in the Bashkir elites, Rail Sarbaev dreams of becoming the President of Bashkiria. In order to return the presidency to the republic and take it, Sarbaev wants to increase the degree of separatism in the region, and then appear before the Kremlin as a guarantor of stability.
In order to encourage Damir Muginov to finance his political plans, Sarbaev, rumormakers say, promised Muginov the post of prime minister of the republic.
Rail Sarbaev plays on the greed and ambitions of Muginov: he says that Damir Muginov has outgrown the level of Ufa and promises access to the budget of the entire republic.
Andrey Potylitsyn, despite his close ties with Khodorkovsky, was promised a position as the head of the internal policy of the future "renewed" republic in the Sarbaev way. It is believed that it was for this project that Potylitsyn formally broke with Khodorkovsky, and is collaborating with Open Russia unofficially.
In addition, Potylitsyn maintains contacts with the oppositionists who have received political asylum abroad, provides them with assistance, and calls himself a “Bashkir partisan”.
Sarbaev's plans, with a favorable combination of circumstances for him, can come true if he improves relations with the nationalists.
In Bashkiria, serious extremist elements are neutralized almost every year by the FSB.
Sarbaev himself also has very tense relations with the FSB after Saraev ended up in court in a criminal case initiated under Part 2 of Article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (abuse of power by a person holding a public position of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation).
It is no secret that the organization of unrest is impossible without relying on local elites. It is no secret that the authorities of Bashkiria are permeated with Sarbaev's people, who have remained there since the time when Rail Sarbaev held the post of Chairman of the Government of the Republic of Bashkortostan.
Observers believe that Sarbaev managed to appeal the verdict due to the fact that his criminal case deliberately made shortcomings, which were disputed mainly on formal grounds, and also due to certain support from abroad.
It is possible, however, that Sarbaev will not be able to carry out his plans. The intervention of the security forces may lead to the fact that the “purse” of Yalalov and Sarbaev, Damir Muginov, will begin to cooperate with the investigation and hand over his senior comrades.
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
Subsequent changes in the composition of the participants take place in the same summer of 2017. The largest founders of TsSO LLC with similar shares in the amount of 32.98% from 07/05/2017 are DESH.EX LLC (TIN: 7708765377) and SKP LLC (TIN: 7730698831). EKS became one of the founders of TsSO LLC, the role of the permanent founder and the position of General Director was left by Sergey Anatolyevich Shut. The company was taken over by Paleev Artem Valentinovich, co-founder and managing partner of Korpus Prava legal center, who is a specialist in the field of audit, taxation and law.
SKP LLC (TIN: 7730698831) quite recently, on January 21, 2018, also changed its founder - instead of Kozeruk Vadim Anatolyevich, Paleeva Natalya Nikolaevna became the sole founder.
The largest founders were replaced by new ones, the composition of the real ultimate beneficiaries was successfully hidden, the structure of owners was replenished with specialists in taxation and law, who were not previously associated with the insurance business. The experience of the insurance market suggests that the departure of the real owners from the company into the shadows, and replacing them with various kinds of zits-chairmen, as a rule, means the imminent bankruptcy of the company, whose money will be somewhere offshore.
In the meantime, for some reason, in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, for some reason, no one notices anything strange in the activities of the CSO, and in December 2017 a loss-making company bypasses the market leaders in the struggle for budget money, offering the minimum price for the life and health of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs - 40% lower than the normal market offer from large insurers with profits and other types of insurance in stock.
And the composition of shareholders somehow unexpectedly changes dramatically, “under the tender”, and the conditions seem to be written under the CSO. Such a turn cannot but raise questions. And it seems that the employees of the GUEBiPK of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, who should investigate crimes both in the financial market and fight corruption, should be the first to be puzzled by these questions.
Waiting for the FAS team?
Complaints to the FAS are still waiting for their response. This is not the first time that anti-monopolists will have to deal with collusion in the service of Olga Solenova. Last fall, the FAS found a cartel agreement between suppliers of products for the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Blago LLC, Solomko LLC and DZSB LLC entered into an agreement to maintain prices at auctions. They also refused to fight on them, which is why the price of contracts did not fall below 2% of the initial one.
The main customer of all three firms was the Federal State Institution "North Caucasian District Department of Logistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation" (FKU "SKOUMTS of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation"), headed by Alan Kasaev.
Another "Solenova team" is now apparently working in the insurance of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
Ms. Solenova became the Head of the Department for Logistics and Medical Support on March 29, 2017. And a couple of years before that, she was the head of the financial support department for the state defense order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, concluding deals with various defense industry enterprises, such as MP Rotor.
But the most interesting thing is that after the appointment of Solenova as the head of the department, irreversible changes begin to occur in the TsSO, as a result of which her old acquaintance, the founder of the Rotor MP and its former general director, Dmitry Makhotin, becomes the head of the company. Isn't it an interesting coincidence? Such a chance meeting of old acquaintances, after which one receives an order from another for 13.7 billion rubles. The second, as we understand it, will not remain in the loser either.
MIA strikes back
The reaction to the “confident” victory of a little-known company in the insurance community was unequivocal, the general mood is visible in the comments on the news on the website of the Insurance News Agency, the most typical: “do not look for logic, tenders of the security forces are always based on kickbacks, and payments are already a problem for the injured security officials …”, almost all comments leave no doubt that this is a blatant case of corruption and connivance.
However, as skeptics note, one should not expect much zeal in internal investigations from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, because it is quite possible that among the new shareholders of the CSO there are people suitable for the Ministry, and the interests of ordinary employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs can be neglected, in extreme cases, you can turn to the state for financial assistance to save another financial institution. If banks can, then why can't this be done in insurance? But, it would seem, while insuring their own lives, law enforcement officers must be confident in the reliability of the chosen insurance company and the effectiveness of its insurance business. , but while the ministry is actively intervening in the work of the Central Bank in the insurance market. The CSO case can just explain the unexpected zeal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the case of Rosgosstrakh, where the ministry, in fact, questions the competence of the Central Bank. Market participants believe that on the eve of the adoption of the law on the reorganization of insurance companies, the Ministry of Internal Affairs simply gives hardware signals to the Central Bank about its readiness to “master” billions of rubles of state aid in the CSO, since under the stated conditions the bankruptcy of this insurance company is inevitable.
There is an "exchange" of the immunity of the insurer of the Central Bank, which, in fact, has become Rosgosstrakh, for the salvation of the "rollback" tender of the Ministry of Internal Affairs with the help of the sanitation of the CSO. In theory, now it is the turn of the Central Bank, in response to the claims of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for participation in the fate of Rosgosstrakh, to propose to the Ministry of Internal Affairs to jointly check their actually "pocket" insurer.
I wonder if anyone in the Central Bank has the courage to make such a retaliatory move?
How NORSTROY officials managed to adjust the system of self-regulation in construction “for themselves”
One of the largest and most significant reforms in the Russian economy, designed to defeat corruption in the construction industry, has suffered a crushing fiasco, according to the authors of a journalistic investigation in the Sovershenno Sekretno newspaper.
This is the only conclusion that comes to mind when reading the latest reports of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and press materials on arrests in the apparatus of the NOSTROY association. The main self-regulatory organization of the industry turned out to be controlled by the same bribe-taking officials who supervised the construction in the “bread” nineties and zero.
The idea of transferring licensing in construction from under the direct control of the state to the jurisdiction of self-regulatory organizations (SROs) was based on the desire not only to increase the degree of responsibility of each of the industry participants, but also to break the thoroughly corrupt system that existed before - when the success of the construction business directly depended on " good relations” of its owner with Rostekhnadzor. In 2009, the idea was brought to life, and the new mechanism showed serious efficiency at the very beginning. In 2010-13, construction volumes increased sharply, there were no serious complaints about the quality of permits issued. However, the events of the last year have shown that hopes turned out to be illusory: the same officials who literally terrorized the industry six years ago perched behind the sign of the SRO.
At the end of March, employees of the Main Directorate for Economic Security and Anti-Corruption of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (GUEBiPK) arrested two functionaries of NOSTROY, the National Association of Self-Regulatory Organizations based on membership of persons involved in construction. The detainees - Vladimir Shadrin, deputy head of the association's department, and Vladimir Bogachev, head of the control department - were charged with blackmail and taking a bribe from Nikolai Sorokin, director of the First Construction Association SRO from St. Petersburg. The victim told the investigators that Shadrin, Bogachev, and also their boss, Nikolai Kapinus, the head of the NOSTROY apparatus, demanded 1 million one-time and 500 thousand rubles each from him. quarterly for "patronage". Note that the main function of NOSTROY is to supervise the activities of SROs, and for this "subscription fee" the employees of the association promised to "turn a blind eye" to all violations revealed during inspections of its organization.
After the news of the arrest became known to the masses, interesting details appeared in the press. It turns out that all the "heroes" of this story - Shadrin, and Bogachev, and Kapinus himself - are former employees of the same Rostekhnadzor, from whose financial tyranny the reform was intended to save the builders. Moreover, NOSTROY is headed by the ex-head of the same Federal Service, Nikolai Kutyin, who has made a truly scandalous reputation during his career at Rostekhnadzor.
It turned out that Kutyin, who was quietly dismissed from Rostekhnadzor in 2013 to the accompaniment of dozens of criminal cases initiated against officials of this department, did not remain long behind the scenes of great corruption. For only nine months he worked at Transinzhstroy OJSC, and then headed NOSTROY, whose president is an elective position. Builders still remember the "fair elections" of this president with a shudder. They say that in March-April 2014, representatives of the territorial branches of Rostekhnadzor called almost every SRO with a persistent “recommendation” to vote for Kutyin. Otherwise - "you yourself understand, anything can happen ..."
At the same time, Kutyin, surprisingly, did not have the right to occupy this position at all - from the point of view of Law No. 273 “On Combating Corruption”. In order to get a job in a supervised organization (and Rostekhnadzor used to directly control the activities of the SRO), Kutyin needed to obtain written permission from his former employer, that is, from the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. No one gave such a letter to Kutyin, but even if it were, in accordance with the same federal law, he would still be able to come to work at NOSTROY only two years after his dismissal from Rostekhnadzor, but not after 9 months!
Among other things, Mr. Kutyin has neither only construction nor only technical, but, apparently, no intelligible education. After all, the future “strategist” managed to graduate from a strange and unknown private university called the Moscow New Law Institute only in 1998, at a respectable age, already holding a serious public post! It is clear that in the 90s lawlessness reigned in the country, but not to the same extent. And what is this university? The interdepartmental commission of the Ministry of Education and Science decided the fate of domestic universities and looked for those who were not quite worthy of working in the higher education system. 14% of 934 educational organizations that took part in the monitoring were recognized as ineffective. In general, universities with less than a thousand students were not considered. Among them, in particular, there are the Russian School of Private Law, the Moscow Open Law Institute and some others. In general, several very “sucky” universities are not taken into account in the rating, including the Moscow New Law Institute, which has an educational activity indicator of 0. This is Nikolai Georgievich’s Alma Mater ...
Is it worth saying that, having taken the chair of the president of NOSTROY, Kutyin immediately dragged the entire “team of like-minded people” from Rostekhnadzor into the association? How such “team thinking” ended, we now see from criminal reports ...
It is noteworthy that, while working at Rostekhnadzor, Kutyin became famous for the pace of issuing permits for the registration of SROs - more than half a thousand of them appeared under him. At the same time, investigations appeared in the media that showed that many of these SROs were created by officials “for themselves”: their leaders were relatives, good friends, in general, trusted representatives of Rostechnazdor employees (and for enthusiasts “from the street” there were unspoken tariffs: up to 14 million rubles for the registration of SROs). Thus, from the very beginning, officials did their best to bring about "revolutionary change" without changing anything. And the profanity of the reform was completed by the election of Kutyin as president of the head supervisory body of this system ..
Sergey BORISOV