Natalia Vitrenko - the most interesting thing in blogs. Vitrenko, Natalia Mikhailovna Vitrenko last performance of the year

Natalia Vitrenko is called "Ukrainian Zhirinovsky" in a skirt. However, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party is not an idol for Natalia Mikhailovna. She, as she herself admitted, is more impressed by the image of Fidel Castro.
Natalia Vitrenko believes in her star. “Although I am not a superstitious person, I believe in the forecast of the famous astrologer Pavel Globa. He believes that a woman named Oksana or Natalia will save Ukraine,” she says.

ambition

Natalia Vitrenko demonstrates her own political ambitions, referring exclusively to the interests of the people.

“I don’t need positions to work,” says Natalia Mikhailovna and confesses: “I believe that the right and duty of the head of state is to head the executive branch. For example, I am ready to do it” (“Zerkalo Nedeli”, July 3, 1999).

Vitrenko campaigns for himself like this: “I frankly say that everyone should unite around Natalia Vitrenko - mother of many children, doctor of sciences, leader of the Progressive Socialist Party, leader of the women's organization "Gift of Life". How else to say? Female! And all astrologers say that a woman will save Ukraine” (Radio Liberty, July 31, 2004).

The area in which Natalia Vitrenko gives complete freedom to her ambitions is the economy. Natalia Mikhailovna claims that her plan of economic reforms is being successfully implemented today by President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko: “In this case, Vitrenko should be assessed as the author of that direction of economic reforms, which is opposite to what is being carried out in Ukraine and which has been implemented today in Belarus” (“Zerkalo Nedeli ”, November 10, 2001). The leader of the PSPU admits that for her political activity plays a rather important role in life: “For me, politics is a vocation. And I can’t imagine my life without defending my own opinion” (“Viborcha Maysternya”, February 27, 2002).

Biography

She was born on December 28, 1951 in Kyiv. In 1973 she graduated from the Kyiv Institute of National Economy with a degree in statistics. She was a Lenin Scholar. Her classmates are Petr Germanchuk, Mikhail Kaskevich and Vasily Gureev. From 1977 to 1979 she worked as a researcher at the Ukrainian Research Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the State Planning Committee of the Ukrainian SSR. After that, for 10 years she held the position of associate professor at the Department of General Theory of Statistics at the Kiev Institute of National Economy. In 1989-1991, he was a senior researcher at the Council for the Study of the Productive Forces of the Academy of Sciences. Until January 1995 - Advisor to the Chairman Verkhovna Rada Ukraine Oleksandr Moroz. Since December 1994 - People's Deputy, member of the Socialist Party faction.

In January 1996, Natalia Vitrenko left the SPU, and in April she was elected leader of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine.

In the presidential elections of 1999, Natalia Mikhailovna took fourth place (10.97%). But she says that the victory was stolen from her.

During the 2002 parliamentary elections, Natalia Vitrenko's bloc did not overcome the 4% barrier (3.22%). According to the leader of the PSPU, the results of the parliamentary elections were rigged. Several attempts to get a deputy mandate in the majority districts in Cherkassy, ​​Melitopol, Chernihiv in the current composition of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for Natalia Vitrenko were unsuccessful.

Now she is unemployed. As Natalia Vitrenko herself says, no one in the state needs her knowledge and experience.

Since February 2004 - Chairman of the People's Movement of Ukraine "Forever with Russia".

In 2004, presidential candidate Vitrenko received the support of 1.53% of Ukrainians who voted.

During the 2006 parliamentary elections, Natalia Vitrenko's bloc "People's Opposition" received the support of 2.93% of those who voted and did not get into the Ukrainian parliament. Attempts by the PSPU to challenge the election results were unsuccessful.
In 2007, in the "Top 100" most influential people Ukraine, which is annually determined by the magazine "Korrespondent", Natalia Vitrenko took the 88th position.

In the early parliamentary elections of 2007, Natalia Vitrenko topped the list of the PSPU. The party received the support of 1.32% of voters, which was not enough to get into parliament.

views

Natalia Vitrenko for:

• ensuring the power of the people through the system of sovereignty of the councils;
• election of judges by the people;
• elimination of parliamentary immunity, benefits for people's choices;
• securing the right of legislative initiative for the trade unions;
• introduction of state guarantees for employment;
• creation of an interstate union Ukraine-Belarus-Russia with a single currency for interstate settlements;
• protection of the domestic market of Ukraine from the US dollar;
• reduction of direct taxes to 7%;
• abolition of VAT;
• single fixed tax for entrepreneurs;
• decline interest rate for a loan up to 4% per annum and stimulation of long-term loans;
• creation of the State Budget Bank;
• that women occupy 50% of the seats in power structures;
• maintaining the current size of the army;
• introduction of fixed energy prices;
• restoration of the system of guarantees for citizens;
• granting the status of the state language to the Russian language;
• withdrawal of Ukraine from the IMF;
• reprivatization of property;
• mass construction of helioaerobaric thermal power plants;
• protecting the rights of Kurdish leader Öcalan;
• transformation of Chernihiv into the capital of the political unification of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus.

Natalia Vitrenko against:

• Ukraine's accession to NATO;
• Yulia Tymoshenko, Petr Simonenko, Alexander Moroz, Viktor Yushchenko, Viktor Pynzenyk, Sergei Terekhin;
• the sale of land and the Land Code adopted by Parliament in October 2001;
• the war in Iraq;
• US interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine.

Ideal

Previously, the ideal for Natalia Vitrenko was the former Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi. Because, as the leader of the PSPU stated, “she became the mother of the people” (“Viborcha maysternya”, March 6, 2002). Now the ideal of Natalia Mikhailovna is Fidel Castro. “To live the same life, to be as brave and professional is my dream,” confessed the leader of the PSPU (Kyiv Telegraph, January 23, 2004).

Compromising evidence

On the leader of the Progressive Socialist Party - not so much compromising information. It concerns her connections with the presidential administration and with the oligarchs. So, on the eve of the 2002 parliamentary elections, rumors were actively circulated in the press regarding the possible involvement of the well-known businessman Vadim Rabinovich in financing the PSPU in exchange for 30% of the party list. However, this information has not been confirmed. Natalia Vitrenko herself says that her party "has never been, and will never be, financed by the presidential administration, Volkov's group, or Rabinovich's group" (Forum, March 20, 2002).

Natalia Mikhailovna claims that she was never sold to anyone: “I was surprised: Rabinovich never gave us money, how did this rumor appear? .. And I want everyone to remember that Vitrenko is not for sale. Therefore, neither with Vadim Rabinovich, nor with others, I had no agreements. Besides, I last saw Rabinovich two or three years ago at the Russian embassy” (“Capital News”, November 25, 2001).

Three years ago, information also appeared in the press about the possible involvement of Natalia Vitrenko and her party in the oil quotas that Saddam Hussein's regime provided to its adherents. However, this information has not found official confirmation.

Leonid Kuchma

For quite a long time, information has been circulating on the sidelines that the PSPU is a political technology development of the presidential administration of Leonid Kuchma, namely, the late first assistant to the head of state Alexander Razumkov. They say that at one time Vitrenko's "promotion" was aimed at destroying the left camp and weakening the positions of the SPU in the 1998 parliamentary elections. The newspaper The Day claims that it was the government that helped the progressive socialists overcome the 4% barrier: “It was even said that on the last of those three days when the Central Election Commission was counting the election results with all its might, ballots with votes were urgently delivered to those who counted” for the PSPU (The Day, June 30, 1999). Although, as Natalia Vitrenko herself says, she had exceptionally friendly relations with Alexander Razumkov.

Ex-Major of State Security Nikolai Melnichenko claims that the recordings he made in Leonid Kuchma's office contain episodes of behind-the-scenes games between the leader of the PSPU and the president. As a former officer told Ukrayinska Pravda, “the then head of the Security Service of Ukraine Leonid Derkach escorted her to Kuchma’s office so that no one could see her, and she behaved at these rendezvous like an obedient pioneer.” Natalia Vitrenko refutes this information: “I did not have any secret meetings with Kuchma. This is absolutely accurate” (“Ukrainskaya Pravda”, March 5, 2002).

Natalia Mikhailovna says that she was and remains a consistent opponent of Kuchma: “The characters and scenery have already changed a great many times on Bankovaya, and our line - mine and my associates - has remained unchanged since 1991” (“Zerkalo Nedeli”, July 3, 1999 .).

When asked by a Vremya Novostey correspondent how she views the rumors about the involvement of the presidential administration in the PSPU, Natalia Mikhailovna answered quite harshly: “How would you rate it if you were told that you were a prostitute? Mean, dirty people spread rumors to humiliate me, to take away votes from the party. It is beneficial for them to compare Natalia Vitrenko, a doctor of science and an academician of two academies, with some kind of mongrel who was hired for money. Excuse me, I see no equal in the presidential administration” (“Vremya novostei”, February 15, 2002).

By the way, the Shevchenkovsky District Court of Kyiv found that the information about Natalia Vitrenko, disseminated by Major Nikolai Melnichenko regarding cooperation with the presidential administration, does not correspond to reality.

Max Raging

In 2006, Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko stated that Russian businessman Maxim Kurochkin (“Max Beshennyy”) was involved in the financing of the PSPU and had serious claims against Natalya Vitrenko after the failure of her bloc in the parliamentary elections. The PSPU leader denied these allegations. Although Kurochkin himself publicly stated that he sympathized with the PSPU.

Financial situation

According to the declaration, in 2003 Vitrenko received a profit in the amount of 15 thousand hryvnias. This is a salary. The PSPU leader has an apartment of 55 sq. m.

The science

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor. Academician of the Academy of Construction and Economic Cybernetics of Ukraine.

Candidate's thesis - "Statistical and economic analysis of the efficiency of animal husbandry (on the example of collective farms in the Kiev region)" (1977).

Doctoral dissertation - "Regional problems of social infrastructure development" (1994).

Environment

Faithful party member, comrade-in-arms and "squire" - Vladimir Marchenko. He, by the way, sometimes plays the role of a driver. If it is necessary to protect the honor of Natalia Mikhailovna, then Vladimir Romanovich can “drop in” in the jaw - just as it was in the situation with MP Pavel Movchan. The latter somehow inadvertently asked Marchenko at a meeting of parliament not to confuse his own wife with a party comrade. Even Mike Tyson could envy the reaction of Vladimir Romanovich - the head of Enlightenment was in a deep knockdown, having received a concussion in the process.

Natalia Mikhailovna confessed that not only Pavel Movchan, but even Vladimir Romanovich's wife was suspicious of her relationship with Vladimir Marchenko: "There is a certain difficulty - his wife is going through, since we work all the time together" ("The Day", May 1998 G.).

Regalia

According to the results of polls of the population of Ukraine, conducted by the Sotsis-gelap service in 1996, 1997 and 1998, Vitrenko was recognized as the "Woman of the Year".

Family

Divorced.

The eldest daughter is Olga (born 1972), a sociologist by education.

The youngest daughter, Marina (born in 1983), graduated from the Institute of International Relations of the Kiev State University.

Son Yuri (born 1976) is a civil servant.

Has a grandson Mikhail (born 2000).

“For me, escaping to my grandson is like breathing the air of freedom to a prisoner ... His first word is “woman.” He is a very energetic boy. They always say that grandchildren are loved more than children, but until you feel it yourself, you won’t believe it, ”says Natalia Vitrenko (“Capital News”, November 27, 2001).

third force

“We will show that we are the third force in Ukraine that will help the people figure out who to follow,” says the PSPU leader (Segodnya, September 10, 2002).

Student

More recently, Natalia Mikhailovna called Alexander Moroz her student. True, ungrateful. Vitrenko says that during the time when she was his adviser, she tried to organize an economic educational program for the leader of the socialists. However, she believes, these efforts were in vain.

Natalia Mikhailovna is an irreconcilable opponent of Alexander Moroz. After the attempt on her life in October 1999 in Krivoy Rog, the gap between the leader of the PSPU and Alexander Alexandrovich widened. Frost's confidant, Sergei Ivanchenko, was blamed for the incident. Even despite the fact that in the notes of Major Melnichenko it is said that the assassination attempt on the leader of the progressive socialists was inspired by the special services, Natalia Vitrenko continues to accuse Alexander Moroz: “Talks about a “provocation against Moroz” are just talk, and thrown grenades are a terrible reality ... I don't have a cassette (with Major Melnichenko's recordings. - S. R.), nor the statements of Alexander Moroz inspire any confidence. I don't trust him at all as a politician. In general, I know the value of him well... The point is that Oleksandr Moroz was never an independent politician, he always depended on someone” (“Fakty”, January 27, 2000). Later, the leader of the PSPU added: “The issue of the assassination attempt has not yet been resolved. The thing is that Sergei Ivanchenko is the head of Moroz's headquarters, his confidant ... The court proved that the assassination attempt was organized by Sergei Ivanchenko, that Vladimir Ivanchenko, his brother and Andrei Samoilov threw the grenade. Charges have already been filed, but behind the scenes - who ordered it? And what kind of relationship can I have with Frost after that? ("Capital News", November 27, 2001).

“They often try to attribute to me the desire to find out some kind of relationship with Frost. I have not been interested in him for a hundred years! But Moroz is on the list of those key figures who inflicted enormous losses on Ukraine. And I will never remove his guilt from him. Never!" - this is how Natalia Vitrenko explains her "interest" in Alexander Moroz ("Zerkalo Nedeli", November 10, 2001).

“Pyotr Symonenko should thank me every day for the fact that the PSPU nominated my candidacy ... if this had not happened, then Oleksandr Moroz’s entourage would have organized an attempt on the life of the leader of the Communist Party,” says Natalia Vitrenko (Kyiv Telegraph, July 13 2004).

The SPU leader answers Vitrenko with the same “coin”: “To be honest, she doesn’t bother me. What will he say (during the presidential campaign. - S.R.), I know approximately, but I think people know too” (UNIAN, July 7, 2004).

Hobby

Natalia Mikhailovna devotes all her free time to work. Except perhaps for shopping at the market. “The main part of the wardrobe was bought at the Obolon market,” Vitrenko confessed (“Zerkalo Nedeli”, November 7, 1998).

The pronoun "I" in the speeches of Natalia Vitrenko is not the last. The leader of the PSPU likes to speak in his own name. She has no modesty. Vitrenko's "I" is a kind of indicator of her political culture and ambitions, which are seething.

“I am a serious scientist, I have experience, I have knowledge, I have the ability and desire to work. I am an academician, the author of an alternative economic program. For me, the main thing is not to interfere with work.

“I want to tell you that many people's deputies come up to me and confess: “We respect you for the fact that you can say what we ourselves are afraid to say.”

"I am sure that society cannot endlessly sell itself to the oligarchs and be afraid of administrative resources."

“I am deeply convinced that if they don’t listen to me today and don’t even listen to me tomorrow, life will still force me to return to my proposals.”

"I'm the most inconvenient person in the country."

“I know that if I suddenly find myself in a foreign city without a penny, then the local party members will feed me, put me to sleep, and help me get to Kyiv”

"I think that even a very wealthy person can awaken a conscience, and he will understand that our party is fighting for justice."

“I am an adherent of a planned economy, and I am proud of it. There can never be a pure market economy!!!”

“I was the only woman who created a party that in 1998 won the parliamentary elections. I received 11% of the vote in the presidential election, without having the status of an ex-speaker of parliament, like Moroz, and without leading the Communist Party, which is voted for thanks to the merits of former generations.

“I contend that Simonenko did not want to defeat Kuchma in the second round of the presidential election. He gave him the win."

“I am in politics, as if on the front line, and Simonenko and others are somewhere in the trenches.”

“I will never work with a woman (about Tymoshenko. - S.R.), which, like a vulture, wants to tear off only itself.

“I get a lot of offers today. Just a mass. I do not have enough time to accept all these offers. Be on the air."

“I will use everyone. With that goal - to save Ukraine.

“I have always been active in public life and have had the title of “starter” since school.

“I want everything from her (Tymoshenko. - S.R.) to ask, sorry, it didn’t come out at the televised debate: here she is, the oligarch, the richest woman in Ukraine, how did she earn her first million ?!

"I believe in the law."

“I have never been in the corridors of power, in their nomenclature. I have never played with anyone - neither with Kravchuk, nor with Frost, nor with Petya, all the more so ... ".

“I don't understand those who think that if you change Kuchma for Yushchenko, then Ukraine will be better off. It won't!"

“I came into politics not to hone some political technologies. I knew that a mortal threat hung over my state and, like a mother of many children, I made my choice.”

“I see history repeating itself, tragic for humanity: communists unite with fascists.”

"I believe that the salary of a people's deputy should be the same as the industry average."

“...I just call on all women in Ukraine to throw rotten eggs at once, no matter who the presidential candidates are, if only a dirty word is spoken about me.”

"I clearly know that I need to go my own way and go to victory."

"I... probably would not have run if at least someone had offered real ways to save Ukraine."

“...I am convinced that 12 million pensioners in Ukraine should vote for me. For me because when I was in parliament, I fought for a fair pension law and defended my law in the first reading.

“I am convinced that I should go to the second round (meaning - the second round of the 2004 presidential election - S.R.)».

“I want to say that I came to parliament when I lived in a two-room apartment in Obolon, and left the parliament, and I live in a two-room apartment in Obolon. I didn’t have any shares, restaurants, enterprises, airfields, and I don’t have anything, that is, I worked in parliament only for the sake of people.”

"... I want to see Ukraine happy, flourishing, all my activities are aimed at this."

“I stand for freedom of conscience. I believe that the state has no right to interfere with the faith of each person. Everyone has the right to be an atheist in general or to choose their religion.”

("proUA", August 2004).

Sergey Rudenko

Natalia Vitrenko: Towards peace through democratization

The 15 steps to a truce proposed by Petro #Poroshenko are conceptually erroneous, deceitful and characterize the neo-Nazi essence of power, expressed in the slogans "Muscovites to knives", "Glory to the nation - death to enemies." The quintessence of his plan: all who are against the government will be destroyed.

Neither the concept nor the content of Poroshenko's "peace plan" correspond to the norms and principles of international law, do not determine the path to compromises and are not capable of restoring peace and preserving the integrity of the state.

From my point of view, the military conflict in the South-East of Ukraine is not a struggle between the legitimate legitimate authorities and terrorists, but a civilizational conflict, a conflict between Western civilization and the Orthodox one.

Based on this, I propose the following plan for ending the war in Ukraine:

1. Refusal to sign the colonial Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU.

2. Termination of hostilities by the authorities, the use of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the "ATO".

3. Complete disarmament on both warring sides of illegal, unconstitutional military formations.

4. Guarantees for the South-East from ethnic cleansing - the introduction of an international peacekeeping contingent with the participation of the Russian Federation.

5. The beginning of the negotiation process on the basis of unconditional observance of the norms and principles of international law.

6. Preparation of a constitutional reform, in which: a) Ukraine's transition to a federal structure; b) giving the Russian language the status of a state language; c) implementation of the principles of the Declaration on State Sovereignty of Ukraine on non-bloc status and entry into the Eurasian Economic Union; d) changing the state symbols of Ukraine on the basis of a referendum.

8. Criminal liability for the popularization and glorification of Hitler's accomplices from the OUN-UPA.

9. Restoration of the activity of Russian TV channels on the territory of Ukraine.

10. Immediate amnesty for all political prisoners and closure of criminal cases against political opposition.

11. Providing guarantees for the opposition political activity, providing representatives of the opposition with the opportunity to participate in the daily hour-long program "Voice of the Opposition" and weekly participation in the program on the First National TV Channel "Freedom of speech - an alternative to the opposition."

12. Creation of humanitarian corridors in the zones of military conflict and ensuring the activities of the Red Cross organization.

13. In zones of military conflict, ensuring the uninterrupted payment of salaries, pensions and social benefits.

14. In the zones of military conflict, the immediate restoration of the destroyed objects of social and industrial infrastructure.

15. Investigation with the participation of international experts of the murders on #Euromaidan in #Kiev, in #Odessa, #Slavyansk, #Mariupol, #Volnovakha, #Lugansk, the village of Shchastye, including on the facts of the use of cluster and phosphorus bombs.

Chairman of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine Natalia Vitrenko

Natalia Vitrenko is called "Ukrainian Zhirinovsky" in a skirt. However, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party is not an idol for Natalia Mikhailovna. She, as she herself admitted, is more impressed by the image of Fidel Castro.

Backstage patrons

• The PSPU is a political technological development of the presidential administration of Leonid Kuchma, namely, the late first assistant to the head of state Alexander Razumkov, that is, Vitrenko's "promotion" was aimed at destroying the left camp and weakening the position of the SPU in the 1998 parliamentary elections.

• The Den newspaper claims that it was the government that helped the progressive socialists overcome the 4% threshold: “It was even said that on the last of those three days when the Central Election Commission was counting the election results, ballots with votes “for” the PSPU were urgently delivered to those who counted. (The Day, June 30, 1999). Natalia Vitrenko herself claims that she had exceptionally friendly relations with Alexander Razumkov.

• Ex-Major of State Security Nikolai Melnichenko notes that the recordings he made in Leonid Kuchma's office contain episodes of behind-the-scenes games between the leader of the PSPU and the president. As a former officer told Ukrayinska Pravda, "the then head of the Security Service of Ukraine Leonid Derkach escorted her to Kuchma's office so that no one could see her, and she behaved here like an obedient pioneer."

Vadim Rabinovich

On the eve of the 2002 parliamentary elections, rumors were actively circulated in the press regarding the possible involvement of the well-known businessman Vadim Rabinovich in financing the PSPU in exchange for 30% of the party list. However, this information has not been confirmed. Natalia Vitrenko herself says that her party "has never been, and will never be, financed by the presidential administration, Volkov's group, or Rabinovich's group" (Forum, March 20, 2002).

Max Raging

progressive socialist

• In January 1996, Natalia Vitrenko left the SPU, and in April she was elected leader of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine.

• In the presidential elections of 1999, Natalia Mikhailovna took fourth place (10.97%). But she says that the victory was stolen from her.

• During the 2002 parliamentary elections, Natalia Vitrenko's bloc did not overcome the 4% barrier (3.22%). According to the PSPU leader, the results of the parliamentary elections were rigged. Several attempts to get a deputy mandate in the majority districts in Cherkassy, ​​Melitopol, Chernihiv in the current composition of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for Natalia Vitrenko were unsuccessful.

Forever with Russia

• On May 1, 2002, Vitrenko announced the creation of the "People's Opposition" in the state.
• Since February 2004 - Chairman of the People's Movement of Ukraine "Forever with Russia".
• In 2004, presidential candidate Vitrenko received the support of 1.53% of Ukrainians who voted.
• During the 2006 parliamentary elections, Natalia Vitrenko's bloc "People's Opposition" received the support of 2.93% of those who voted and did not get into the Ukrainian parliament. Attempts by the PSPU to challenge the election results were unsuccessful.
• In the 2007 early parliamentary elections, Natalia Vitrenko topped the list of the PSPU. The party received the support of 1.32% of voters, which was not enough to get into parliament.
• The leader of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine and the People's Opposition electoral bloc, Natalya Vitrenko, blamed the sponsors of her election campaign for the defeat of her bloc in the 2006 elections. She stated this in an interview with DailyUA.

Friendship with "regionals" to the detriment of ideology

• At the same time, the degree of “wealth” of one or another regional party cell directly depends on the degree of friendship of the “Vitrenkovites” with potential financiers in the regions.

• The ideology of progressive socialists has been unchanged for many years - all the problems in Ukraine are from NATO, the Ukrainian language and disunity with Russia. The main slogan used by Vitrenko is also simple: “Russia, Ukraine, Belarus. Together we are strong". Vitrenko continues to work with a marginalized, not very educated, lumpenized voter who still does not want to understand that the state of Ukraine has taken place.

• Vitrenko herself positions her party as truly independent and truly oppositional and uncompromising. At the same time, a number of observers consider the PSPU a structure with which the leading political players, if common interests are determined, may well agree, even if there is an ideological gap between them. An example of such cooperation can be considered joint anti-NATO speeches with the "oligarchic" Party of Regions.

• As for “internal reserves”, there is simply no big business at the regional level that is not tied to the Party of Regions. For the "regionals" it would be easiest to put a few people on the list of PSPU and control this faction from the inside, if it suddenly gets into the future parliament. But so far, if such attempts have been made, they have not been successful. Natalya Mikhailovna, both in the last elections and today, needs a sponsor who would not require total control, but would like to work piecework - immediately outlining the range of issues that need to be resolved.

• The leader of the Crimean branch of the PSPU (Crimea is the second most important region for the Vitrenkoites after the Donbass), Ivanov, protesting against some decisions of the Simferopol City Council, came to the session with an ax and cut the wires of the voting board. And during last year's picketing of NATO ships in Feodosia, he distinguished himself by chasing the departing convoy of NATO soldiers in an old Tavria and shouting something into a megaphone.

• Unlike Donetsk, where the “Vitrenkovites” quarreled with the “regionals”, in Crimea the relations of these parties are more than warm. PSPU received two permanent commissions in the Armed Forces of the ARC, and in addition the Ministry of Tourism and the Committee for the Protection of Cultural Heritage.

Faithful colleague Marchenko clashes with Movchan

One of the most high-profile scandals in the history of the Rada occurred in April 1997. RUKh member Pavel Movchan from the podium hinted at the relationship between PSPU leaders Natalya Vitrenko and Vladimir Marchenko, saying that the latter "is unable to distinguish his own wife from his party comrade." Movchan refused to apologize publicly, thereby "sentencing" himself to beating. Marchenko, as it turned out, the former boxer laid down Movchan, and Vitrenko finished off with her feet.

Frost Grenades

• During the presidential campaign in the late 1990s, Alexander Moroz was accused by presidential candidate Natalia Vitrenko of organizing an assassination attempt on her. On October 2, 1999, in Krivoy Rog, after Vitrenko met with voters, 2 grenades were thrown at her and those accompanying her. Vitrenko received shrapnel wounds. Ivanchenko, a confidant of Moroz in the presidential elections, was accused of organizing the assassination attempt. During the investigation, Ivanchenko pleaded not guilty, but two other defendants admitted to throwing grenades.

• By official version, around 20.00 on October 2, when the meeting with voters of the Inhulets district of Krivoy Rog was coming to an end and Vitrenko was getting into the car, two RGD-5 grenades were thrown into the crowd. More than 30 people were injured by fragments and the blast wave, four seriously, one of them had his leg amputated. Vitrenko herself received several light tangential wounds. President Leonid Kuchma gave power structures the order to strengthen the security of presidential candidates and personally called Vitrenko to express his sympathy to her.

• Immediately after the explosion, two "bombers" were detained. They turned out to be citizens of Russia, residents of the Rostov region. Both are minors. One of them, by the name of Ivanchenko, according to the Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs, is a close relative of Moroz's confidant in Krivoy Rog. According to the first testimony of the detainees, it was this relative who handed grenades to Ivanchenko and instructed him.

• Oleksandr Moroz was Vitrenko's main rival in the fight for the votes of the left-wing electorate. The Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine (PSPU) was created after the split of the Socialist Party, which progressive socialists once accused of "opportunism" and of supporting the "anti-people ruling regime." In 1995, Natalia Vitrenko was an adviser to the chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Oleksandr Moroz.

reference: In December 1999, as a result of joint operational-search activities, employees of the Security Service of Ukraine and law enforcement agencies of the Russian Federation detained a citizen of Ukraine, Sergei Ivanchenko. Vasily Hrytsak personally detained Ivanchenko. On June 14, 2001, the Dnepropetrovsk Regional Court sentenced Sergei Ivanchenko and his brother Volodymyr, accused of attempting to assassinate Ukrainian presidential candidate, PSPU leader Natalya Vitrenko, to 15 years in prison. 43-year-old Sergei Ivanchenko was found guilty of organizing a terrorist attack to assassinate Vitrenko, smuggling weapons from Russia to Ukraine, and illegal possession of weapons. He was sentenced to 5 years in a general regime prison and 10 years in a penal colony with a high security regime. The chairman of the court, Valentina Kuzmenko, who read out the verdict, determined the motive for organizing the terrorist attack by Sergei Ivanchenko - the desire to help the presidential candidate, leader of the Socialist Party Alexander Moroz in the elections, and also to establish himself in the eyes of the leader of the SPU, whose confidant he was.

Private bussiness

• Natalya Mikhailovna Vitrenko “was married twice, divorced. She is raising three children - two daughters and a son. “By Vitrenko’s own admission, her marriage broke up due to active political activity. Her ex-husband, Yury works in the Ministry of Economy.

• On February 17, 2010, the Internet publication Vlasti.net described some of Vitrenko’s corruption innovations in such a very “fat” position as the head of the entire state system public procurement. In particular, he began to demand a previously non-obligatory certificate from the State Inspectorate for Price Control. This certificate is not included in the list of documents required for public procurement, but in violation of the Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, by order of Vitrenko, the customer is denied a tender if this certificate is not available.

“When applying to the State Inspectorate for Price Control, they demand 5% of the amount of the proposed purchase for its issuance, otherwise the issuance of the certificate is delayed, which delays the purchase. In some cases, such a delay is very expensive for enterprises, up to disruption of production,” it was reported.

• Another way to extort money was to issue a permit to purchase from one contractor. If earlier, in order to obtain a purchase permit from one contractor, it was necessary to get approval from experts from several departments of the Department, now this permit was signed personally by Yuriy Vitrenko. “And he puts his signature only for a bribe in the amount of 4-6 percent of the purchase amount,” the authors of the material reported.

• According to the general opinion of the leaders of a number of industry-forming Ukrainian state-owned enterprises, given the specifics of a number of industrial sectors in Ukraine from defense production to nuclear energy, these actions become not just corruption, but also sabotage against Ukraine.

Vitrenko for secession of Crimea from Ukraine

• The Crimean Republican Committee of the Progressive Socialist Party of Natalia Vitrenko announced its intention to initiate an all-Ukrainian referendum on the separation of Crimea from Ukraine and its annexation to Russia.

• Vitrenko herself motivated this as follows: “Article 73 of the Constitution says that issues of territorial affiliation are decided by an all-Ukrainian referendum.”

• The “Vitrenkovites” called the scandal with the Sevastopol City Council the reason for such an undermining of the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Recall that the Minister of Education Ivan Vakarchuk issued a decree obliging the schools of national minorities to partially switch to teaching in Ukrainian. The Sevastopol City Council responded by issuing a resolution restoring the status quo in the city's schools, most of which are Russian. With this decision, outraged people's deputies from the Ukrainian People's Party (NUNS faction) submitted to the Rada a resolution on the dissolution of the Sevastopol City Council. Actually, this, as they say in the PSPU, prompted them to take action.

AntiNATO

Vitrenko demanded that the UN disband NATO. In Simferopol, representatives of the Crimean organizations of the Communist Party of Ukraine, the Natalia Vitrenko Bloc and the Russian Bloc tried to disrupt the NATO seminar by force. This event was attended by Director of the NATO Information and Documentation Center in Ukraine Michel Duret, representatives of the authorities of Ukraine and Crimea, as well as the military attache of the Embassy of the Slovak Republic in Ukraine Ivo Gagira. There was also a clash between participants in the action Ukraine for NATO!, who on June 29 set up a tent camp near the village of Chernomorsky, Kominternovsky district, and activists of the Party of Progressive Socialists of Ukraine, who arrived there yesterday.

• According to Sergey Ivashov, a member of the board of the Prosvit regional organization, a group of “Vitrenkovites-anti-NATOs”, who also decided to set up a tent city near the Chernomorsky, unexpectedly attacked Odessa Prosvita members, trying to tear up banners and state flags. However, the attackers were rebuffed by the participants of the action Ukraine for NATO! The clash was stopped by a police squad that was on duty next to the tent camps of supporters and opponents of Ukraine's entry into the North Atlantic Alliance.

• Participants in the incident had to explain their actions in writing. The policemen, in turn, filed reports of a hooligan incident. After the civil action Ukraine for NATO! on Cathedral Square in Odessa on June 29, which was initiated by the regional organization of the Prosvita society, the city organization of the Reform and Order Party and the regional coordinating council Ukraine for Euro-Atlantic Integration, about fifty Odessans, mostly of the younger and middle generations, defeated a tent camp in support of NATO near the village of Chernomorsky.

• After the end of a peaceful anti-NATO rally on Independence Square in Kyiv, held by the PSPU and its allies, special forces and police officers, PSPU leader Natalia Vitrenko and Vladimir Marchenko were arrested.

Little Russia

• For Vitrenko (her sponsors) it is important that the myth continues to live in the minds of Ukrainians that without Russia, Ukraine simply cannot.

• Vitrenko appealed to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, US President Barack Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, French President Nicolas Sarkozy with a demand to impose economic sanctions against the Lviv region until the Lviv Regional Council cancels its decision to dismantle monuments to Soviet soldiers.

• “Ukraine, under the patronage of President Yushchenko, is being challenged by the world community: Nazism is being promoted, its accomplices are being rehabilitated, and SS men are being made heroes of Ukraine. Streets are named after Nazi accomplices, monuments are erected to them. At the same time, monuments-symbols of the victory of the Soviet Army over fascism are desecrated and destroyed,” Vitrenko said, the press service of the PSPU reports. She reminded the leaders of the Russian Federation, the United States, France and Great Britain that the atrocities of the Nazis and their accomplices were condemned by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal for crimes against humanity.

In a large family. From 1959 to 1965 lived with her mother in the Donbass, then returned to Kyiv. In 1973 she graduated with honors from the accounting department of the Kiev Institute of National Economy (KINH). She spent three more years in graduate school there. In March 1977 she defended her PhD thesis. In 1994, she became a doctor of economic sciences, defending her dissertation on the topic "Regional Problems of the Development of Social Infrastructure."

Career and political ambitions. From 1977 to 1994 Vitrenko worked as a researcher at the Research Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of the State Planning Committee of the Ukrainian SSR, an associate professor at the Department of Statistics of the Kiev Institute of National Economy, a senior researcher at the Council for the Study of Productive Forces of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

In 1974 she joined the CPSU. And in her student years she was a member of the Komsomol committee of the institute and a deputy of one of the districts of Kyiv. Although, perhaps, leftist views and ideas became very close to her in her early youth or even childhood - Vitrenko's mother, whom she considers a model of a real communist, was a member of the Bureau of the Konstantinovsky city committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine during their stay in Donbass.

In April 1991, Vitrenko spoke at the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine with a report "Privatization and the socialist choice", in which she sharply criticized the privatization that was starting in the country. In the same year, she took part in the development of the economic section of the new edition of the KPU program. At the same time, according to her, she "was shocked that the economists of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine are preparing the program of the Communist Party as a program of transition to the market, that is, the restoration of capitalism." Today Vitrenko calls under the leadership of a long-standing "support of the ruling regime."

After the prohibition of the Communist Party Vitrenko actively involved in the construction. As noted in the official biography of the politician without too much modesty, she became "the main developer of the program documents of the SPU, the head of the theoretical center of the party." In the second half of 1994, she works as an adviser on socio-economic issues to the chairman of the Verkhovna Rada and the leader of the SPU. In December of the same 1994, she was elected a people's deputy in the constituency in Konotop (in her own words, "despite the opposition of the leader of her own party"). In the end, a series of disagreements with the party boss pushes Vitrenko and her colleague Vladimir Marchenko to create a new political project - (PSPU). This happened in 1996.

In 1998, Vitrenko again became a People's Deputy of Ukraine. On the next year running for president of Ukraine. During the election campaign, on October 2, 1999, in Krivoy Rog, after meeting with voters, two RGD-5 live grenades fly at her and the deputies accompanying her. The leader of the PSPU and several other people receive shrapnel wounds. Colleagues and supporters immediately saw the hand of Moroz or the then president in the attack on the "fighter against the regime". Political opponents - "self-order" in order to pity the public and attract new sympathizers. The result of the race - 2 886 972 votes (10.97%), 4th place out of 13 possible in the first round.

Subsequent attempts to get into the Verkhovna Rada or take the main office at 11 Bankova Street were in vain. The last one was in the 2006 parliamentary elections as part of the Bloc of Natalia Vitrenko The People's Opposition, after which Vitrenko tried for a long time to prove that the votes of her political force were simply stolen during the count. By the way, according to a Russian businessman with an ambiguous reputation shot dead in the spring of 2007 (also known as Max Besheny), in the last elections he was involved in financing the PSPU.

Early February2007 year Natalia Vitrenko announced the transition to total opposition, both to the president and the prime minister

In the 2012 elections neither Vitrenko nor the party headed by her took part, due to the lack of necessary funds.

On March 18, 2017, the XXXI Extraordinary Congress of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine was held in Kyiv, which re-elected Natalia Vitrenko to the post of party chairman.

Views and assessments. The party and its leader entered the extraordinary election campaign of 2007 with ideas and slogans already familiar to the public. Socialism, CES, brotherhood with Russia and Belarus are good. Capitalism, the International Monetary Fund, NATO, friendship with Washington is bad. Moreover, if the leaders and activists of progressive socialists manage to fight the IMF, as a rule, only in words, then against the Euro-Atlantic integration of Ukraine - in deeds. Perhaps, not a single more or less noticeable event with the participation of representatives of the North Atlantic Alliance is complete without pickets of the PSPU, fiery speeches by Vitrenko and Marchenko, and hysterical antics of the most "advanced" supporters of Natalia Mikhailovna. Another strongest irritant for the PSPU and a reason to remind yourself is November 10, the birthday of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, which more than once ended in a brawl with nationalist veterans and their young followers.

Vitrenko herself positions her party as truly independent and truly oppositional and uncompromising. At the same time, a number of observers consider the PSPU a structure with which the leading political players, if common interests are determined, may well agree, even if there is an ideological gap between them. An example of such cooperation can be considered joint anti-NATO speeches with the "oligarchic" one.

Family. Vitrenko was twice married and divorced. She has three children: Olga (b. 1972), Yuri (b. 1977), Marina (b. 1983). Grandchildren: Mikhail - (born 2000), Christina - (born 2004) and Grigory - (born 2007), Margarita - (born 2015).

Son of Natalia Vitrenko -Yuricompleted postgraduate studies at the Institute of International Relations, worked as chief adviser to the chairman of the board of NACNaftogaz of Ukraine, as of 2018 - chief executive officer.

Natalia Vitrenko's performances led to her being called the "Ukrainian Zhirinovsky" in a skirt. However, the head of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia does not serve as a model for her. As Natalya Mikhailovna herself claims, she is more sympathetic to the Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

The birth of little Natasha

Vitrenko Natalya Mikhailovna was born in the capital of Ukraine, the city of Kyiv, at the end of 1951 (December 28) in a family with four children, she is Ukrainian by nationality. Two months before the birth of little Natasha, her father dies.

Until the end of his life, he was exhaustingly ill all the years after the war. His health was undermined by the Great Patriotic War, which from the first days he went through as a journalist of RATAU. He dies at the age of forty-two. He dreamed of a son, but a girl was born. And the mother raised the children on her own. During the war years, the eldest daughter died. And then - a long age of the widow, because the woman remained devoted to her only husband. Mom constantly worked very hard: she was an assistant professor, a candidate historical sciences, teacher at the Kiev Medical Institute. In 1959, on a party assignment, she went to Konstantinovka, in the Donbass, to create a general technical faculty of the Ukrainian Polytechnic University. She leaves her older children in Kyiv, and takes little Natalia with her, at that time she was a student of the 1st grade.

Excellence always and everywhere

There, Natasha completed her studies up to the 7th grade practically on her own, because her mother was busy from morning to evening, since there was a period of the formation of the faculty. And my mother copes, and in addition, she does a great job of the party as a member of the bureau of the Konstantinovsky city committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine.

That is why the mother forever remained for Natalia the ideal of a true communist, and the girl tried to be like her in everything. She was an excellent student, an editor of a wall newspaper, trying to be in the center of the events themselves.

Return to Kyiv

In 1965, mother - Valentina Matveevna - goes on a well-deserved rest, and from that moment she leaves with her daughter back to Kyiv.

In Kyiv, Natasha's studies were excellent, she attended rhythmic gymnastics and basketball circles, and was the secretary of the school organization of the Lenin Komsomol.

Student years

In 1969, having successfully completed the 37th Kiev secondary school, he was enrolled after excellently passed exams at the Kyiv Institute of National Economy (KINH). During this period at the institute, she becomes the owner of the Lenin Scholarship, a deputy of the Council of Workers of the Soviet District of Kyiv and is a member of the Komsomol Committee.

Conducts scientific activities at the institute, wins in the Republican and international competitions scientific works students.

In 1971 she marries, and a year later she has her first child - a girl. Studying at the university ended with a diploma with honors, and therefore Vitrenko receives a referral to study at graduate school.

In August-November 1973, Natalya Mikhailovna Vitrenko (her biography, in terms of eventfulness, becomes similar to the biography of a workaholic mother), holds the position of senior economist in the statistical department of transport of the Central Statistical Bureau of the Ukrainian SSR.

PhD

Period from 1973 to 1976 - postgraduate studies at KINH. Since 1974, Natasha has become a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

And again, in graduate school, studies are fruitful and extremely active. Vitrenko Natalia performs dissertation research work " Statistical Methods study of production efficiency.

At this time, he is engaged in teaching, jointly develops the economic topics of the institute, and in parallel performs the work of the Komsomol as deputy secretary of the committee for work with an ideological orientation. Before graduating from graduate school, Natalia gives birth to a second child - a boy named Yuri.

In March 1977, Vitrenko Natalya Mikhailovna successfully defended her dissertation for the title of candidate. From April 1977 to 1979, starting from the position of a junior researcher and ending with a senior one, he worked at the NTI Research Institute of the State Planning Committee of Ukraine.

Period of work in alma mater

In 1979 he returned to his alma mater (KINH). Here, Natalia Mikhailovna Vitrenko not only works as an assistant professor of the statistical department, leads practical classes, leads students with a thesis and postgraduate students, but also conducts active scientific work on problematic issues in macroeconomics, on the structure of society's production and the role of social internal structure. In the Soviet Union, she initiates a course of lectures on social infrastructure statistics. Plunging into research on a similar topic, he receives a special internship in the united department of the State Planning Committee of the Ukrainian SSR.

In order to complete his doctorate (1989), he was transferred to the Council for the Study of the Productive Forces of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR as a senior researcher.

In 1983, her 3rd child, Marina, was born.

She worked in the Council until 1994. In April 1991, she participates in a meeting at the Academy of Sciences, where Natalya Vitrenko delivers a report on the topic “Privatization and the socialist choice”, in which she extremely sharply criticizes the privatization processes starting at that time in the state.

In 1991, he took part in the process of developing the economic section new program Communist Party of Ukraine. In connection with the ban on the Communist Party, Natalya Mikhailovna intensively begins the formation of the Socialist Party of Ukraine, acts in the newly created party as the main author of party programs, head of the theory center, and editor of the Vybor magazine. In May 1993, the monographic work "Social Infrastructure of Ukraine: Assessment of the Level and Prospects of Development" was published.

Cooperation with BP

In April 1994, Natalya Mikhailovna defended her dissertation for the title of Doctor of Science. During this period, he prepares for the Verkhovna Rada the program work “The main directions of formation in the crisis period”, and on 15.06.94 it is adopted by the parliament.

From April 1994 to January 1995, Vitrenko served as Advisor to the Chairman of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on socio-economic issues A. Moroz.

At the end of 1994, he became a people's deputy from the Konotop constituency in the Sumy region. A year later, he accuses the Socialist Party of colluding with the authorities, for this reason he is excluded from the party ranks.

In April 1996, in cooperation with V. Marchenko, he formed the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine (PSPU), which he announced as his own project for the revival of Soviet power.

Assassination attempt on N. Vitrenko

During the election campaign in March 1998, the party organization gains 4.05% of the votes and goes to the Supreme Council.

During the election campaign on October 2, 1999, an attempt was made on Natalya Mikhailovna in Krivoy Rog. At the end of the meeting with the voters, two combat grenades fly towards her and the deputies who accompanied her. Vitrenko is injured by shrapnel, at that moment forty-four voters were injured.

presidential races

In the 1999 presidential elections, it occupies the fourth position, gaining 10.97% of the electoral votes.

On May 1, 2002, Vitrenko Natalya Mikhailovna announces the formation of the "People's Opposition" in Ukraine.

In 2002, she became the head of the electoral "Natalia Vitrenko Bloc" (gaining a little over 3%). With so many votes, one does not cross the electoral line. In 2002, in Cherkassy, ​​Vitrenko puts forward his candidacy for by-elections to the Supreme Council (he takes the second position, losing to Shufrich, a representative of the united Social Democratic Party of Ukraine). Later, evidence was presented of electoral fraud in the direction of Shufrich.

At the end of 2002 in the city of Melitopol, he took second place, in the middle of 2003 in Chernigov he was generally removed from the electoral race.

In the first stage of the presidential race in 2004, he occupies the fifth position (1.53% of the vote).

In parliamentary races-06, her party takes part in common block"People's Opposition", consisting of two parties (2.93% of the vote). This block additionally includes the "Russian-Ukrainian Union" ("Rus"). In accordance with their own slogans, they advocate the reunification of Ukraine with Russian Federation and Belprus and call for refusal to join NATO, the European Union and the World Trade Organization.

List of influential Ukrainian persons

In 2007, in the "Top 100" of the most influential people in Ukraine, determined by the magazine "Korrespondent", Natalya Vitrenko (biography contributed to this) occupies the 88th step.

On the early elections to Parliament-07 Vitrenko tops the list of PSPU. The party is supported by only 1.32%, which, of course, is not enough to get into the Supreme Soviet.

This is N. Vitrenko's biography. Natalya Vitrenko is not only a politician, but also the mother of three successful and prosperous children. She had two marriages in her life.